The United States Constitution

[reality_hammer]

The latest item to make the "enemies list" for liberals

Comments

[izuko]

They've rediscovered it.

Doesn't mean they've READ it, since the constitution doesn't actually require that for legislators.

[reality_hammer]

And they're still missing the point about what the Constitution is (and isn't). A scheduling error isn't a violation of the Constitution. :P

The disingenuous "general welfare" spam is covering the Internets, too.

[izuko]

Right. Art. VI requires public officials to be bound by oath or affirmation. However, the language is VERY different than Art. II, which requires the president to be sworn in before taking office.