30,000 scientists sign up to sue Al Gore

[reality_hammer]

Sweet, sweet justice. Led by the founder of the Weather Channel, 9,000 PhDs and 30,000 scientists overall are on board to sue the figurehead of the global warming hoax.

Click to view

Great news! Finally the perpetrators of one of the greatest frauds in history will have to demonstrate their lack of evidence, lack of science and lack of integrity.

Comments

[kierthos]

Someone needs to let FOX News know that CO2 is a pollutant

[bull]

I would have to disagree. Global Warming has not been proven to be real, if we are to believe the findings of most individuals who say it is, then we are to believe that a increase in global tempatures of about one degree is man caused. Does the earth warm and cool, or course it does, but it does so on a natural cycle of time.

The estimate of about one degree is the best I could find out there.

As far as C02, 96.5% of it is produced by the ocean as part of the natural process of Photosynthesis.

The earths tempature changing is not being debated, of course it's going to change as it has in the past.

It's how much man is contributing to that change is what I think is up for debate

[kierthos]

Errr... CO2 is 'eaten' by photosynthesis, not produced by it. And the oceans are a carbon sink

[bull]

Opps, that should not have been Carbon, that should have been greenhouse gases. Sometimes I type to fast for my own good.

There is nothing wrong with having cleaner air, but now you are talking about two different things. The contribution man makes to any sort of change in the earth's climate and well clean air.

However when the air is not dirty, and a anti-corporate, anti-big oil agenda is what contribues to idea that man is causing the earth to warm, we are all going to die, the only way to fix it is to cut out this, this, and this. That is when it is a issue.

[timely_musing]

FYI as far as I can tell that video is over a year old. I wonder what has happened since then?

[reality_hammer]

I'm guessing the issue is which (legal) venue to use.

As for me, I'd use England for libel/slander. It's very easy to get a favorable verdict there for that.

Other than that you're going to have to choose someplace where the science won't be lost on the judge/jury (I still cringe that a judge needed to use a "special expert" to tell him whether Microsoft was doing bad things) and whether your case won't be hijacked by an activist judge/panel of judges (like the US Ninth).

I suspect that Gore, et al, will attempt to drag out any lawsuits for years and years, hoping to bleed the other side dry. They know they can count on being subsidized by governments and NGOs while anyone suing them will have to rely on private funds.

[kierthos]

While England does have very strong libel/slander laws, I would think one of them would have to be English in order to sue there. It would also help if there were actual libel/slander. If Gore hasn't directed any statements specifically at Coleman, it's a bit difficult to prove libel. Also, abusive comments are not libel in the UK. So, Gore could say "Anyone who denies global warming is a complete nutter." and it wouldn't be slander (slander is spoken, libel is written. Of course, there's the fact that I wrote this, but this is a hypothetical statement anyway.)

Given that Gore was a journalist for a few years and has a law degree, I'm reasonably sure he would avoid most of the libel/slander pitfalls.

Now, if Coleman is still attempting to bring a fraud lawsuit, that's an entirely different kettle of fish.

[schpydurx]

Now I have something to be thankful for this Thanksgiving!

[writerspleasure]

but they are not, you know, scientists scientists, i'm sure.