Just curious...
Would you consider the stuff I make (Daily Fanart posts, any icons, headers, banners etc) to be fanart or am I just kidding myself? Seems like there are others in the fandom who truly make fanart with text and tons of layers and effects. I see pieces on Tumblr and here on LJ that are much more elaborate (not to mention beautiful).
(
Read more... )
Comments 45
Reply
Reply
I think what you post is wonderful.
Reply
I'd count it as a range of creations starting from something that takes an original photo and amends it in some way, something that puts your personal touch or spin on the original piece, which is what you do - then all the way over to something that is totally new and original in its own right (maybe like the art petite_madame does).
So long story short, I'd say what you do with your edits is a form of fanart, yes.
Reply
Thanks. Most people seem pretty open to whatever in the way of fanart, which is nice. I just see all this beautiful, amazing pieces on tumblr, look at my stuff and think...."Well this is crap." LOL
Reply
Reply
Don't let yourself feel inferior simply because other artists do different stuff. I love your art.
Reply
I think the fact that fanart has no clear cut definition might be part of the problem. Sometimes it's hard for me to think of what I do as fanart when I just slap a couple of effects on a cap. :P
Reply
as for the layers and text ect... as beautiful as they are, I think that sometimes less is more. I love how most of the time you just let an image speak for itself.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment