Professional sports as opiate of the masses

Nov 06, 2007 09:05

While watching a baseball game a few weeks ago, I wondered why people have affiliations with sports teams. What makes them care so much about the fortunes of an organization from which they receive no tangible benefit? More surprisingly, why is it that so many people care more about the progress of the sports teams they follow than they do about ( Read more... )

psychology, politics, sociology

Leave a comment

Comments 6

(The comment has been removed)

quikchange November 6 2007, 19:27:27 UTC
Does that mean that people would take a more active interest in politics if we had bookies involved?

Reply

lambda_calculus November 6 2007, 19:39:50 UTC
There's apparently a website for just that. Let me see if I can find it after work...

Reply

morethanreal November 8 2007, 08:52:17 UTC
InTrade and News Futures, among others. They're probably as good as polls if not better.

There're a couple reasons why people are more interested in spectator sports than current affairs. Entertainment, local identity, escapism (part of entertainment I guess), herd mentality, etc..

Reply


tangbu November 6 2007, 21:55:41 UTC
Exactly this topic came up at work many years ago. One guy's hypothesis was that "we're all losers", so we compensate by trying to associate ourselves with a winning sports team. This doesn't explain the Maple Leafs.

Reply


jfpoole November 9 2007, 23:21:20 UTC
I've seen the same behavior (albeit not on the same scale with companies) -- look at the loyal fan base Apple has, for example.

Reply

quikchange November 9 2007, 23:33:53 UTC
To some degree, that behaviour on the part of Macheads does reflect self-interest, because the network effect means that more marketshare for the Mac improves the user-experience for Mac users (by giving them more choices of peripherals, 3rd-party software, etc.), although I'll hand you that this does not entirely account for it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up