Subversive language and the role of philosophy

Oct 02, 2007 20:06


"I am writing a book."  This is not as creative, interesting, or impressive as it actually sounds, so in my day-to-day interactions I like to just leave it at that.  "I am writing a book."  If pressed for details, I'll reveal that it's a Korean history book.  The rights to this book will be sold to a Korean businessman, who wants to publish the ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

Good philosophy is about the meaning of utterances? dpolicar October 3 2007, 03:28:52 UTC
"Good" philosophy does not seek to establish basic truths or determine what is "right" and what is "wrong", but searches out the answer to a single, fundamental question: what does it mean when we say X?

Hm.

Hmmm.

So, here I am, with my finger on the trigger of the gun whose muzzle is leaning on the temple of my chosen victim, and suddenly by a fluke of telepathic contact my mind is all at once filled with a deep and comprehensive understanding of all the good philosophy ever done by humans.

In your view, does any of that new understanding make me reconsider my previous decision to squeeze the trigger?

If so, why would that be?

Reply

Re: Good philosophy is about the meaning of utterances? quietphilosophe October 3 2007, 04:17:28 UTC
What are your motives?

Will philosophy dramatically change the behavior of humans on a micro level? Probably not. One would like to think that certain individuals, offered the insight of a rigorous course in thinking, might rethink instituting the Holocaust, or the Inquisition, or various efforts at oppressive colonialism. But there's no real telling.

On the same note, take the same individual with the same gun to the same victim's head. Via telepathic contact, you can fill him with the knowledge contained in any of the humanities, sciences, or any other field. Which one stops the squeezing of the trigger?

Reply

Re: Good philosophy is about the meaning of utterances? dpolicar October 3 2007, 04:32:30 UTC
I'm not claiming that any other field would stop it.

But the idea that moral philosophy gives up entirely on the notion that a comprehensive grounding in good moral philosophy changes the way one thinks about things like committing murder seems strange to me, so I wanted to confirm that this is indeed what you were claiming.

Reply

Re: Good philosophy is about the meaning of utterances? quietphilosophe October 3 2007, 04:50:56 UTC
I'm pretty sure it's not what I was claiming.

Reply


sarcazm October 3 2007, 09:48:55 UTC
you're right. the english language is totally subjective. which is why it's one of the hardest languages to learn, what with all the nuances, etc.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up