HAI. Yes, so the excellent folks at
Shousetsu Bang Bang have put out another issue, themed Historical Romance. Their stories are always quality, and good clean fun--I recommend you check it out. I did them up a cover for this issue based roughly on
this old photo. 1950s existentialist kids at the Cafe de Flore, that sort of thing. (WE HAVE ALWAYS
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
akfjksldjada. you are amazing <3 the color scheme is amazing, the GAY MARXISTS ARE AMAZING, IT'S ALL AMAZING
HI
Reply
Ah, I've wanted to draw some gay Marxists in France ever since reading the Roads to Freedom and furiously shipping Brunet/Schneider in the third book. (Iris Murdoch shipped it too! Of course in this case, this is post-WWII, so there will be no terrible tragic ending, with the one dying in the other's arms as they try to escape a Nazi prison camp.)
Reply
I also love the way you put the words "existentialist" and "kids" together. That's awesome.
Reply
And...aha well, you know. :D The impression I always have of that time is of a lot of very young people talking about the bleakness and emptiness and loneliness of a life they've barely experienced at all yet (I remember my Art History prof., who was a feminist, mentioned some professor of hers back in the day who considered himself an existentialist, and he used to say to her "You know...you're born alone and you die alone.", and she said "...yeah, you're alone. Except for that woman straining to get you out of her body.". And then you have sculptors like Giacometti whose figures are always gendered by whether or not they're walking--men walk, women just STAND THERE. There are plenty of philosophers and writers and artists from that movement and period whom I like--there's just plenty of crap to be deconstructed out of all of it to find the useful part.).
Reply
OH. SNAP. I've heard "you're born naked" but never "you're born alone." That's gold-star fail, right there. I detect a whiff of Freudianism: birth is REJECTION by the mother. LOL. This guy exited the womb and promptly started to smoke the cigar given to him by his father, amirite? With a little beret...I'm kind of caffeinated right now.
Reply
That would definitely explain a lot. THOSE CRAZY WOMEN AND THEIR SEPARATE PHYSICAL EXISTENCES. I don't quite know what an equally neurotic interpretation of the 'basic facts of existence' that took women rather than men as the default starting point would look like, but I'd love to find out. CONCEPTION IS ABANDONMENT BY THE FATHER. IDK. I've only recently started reading anything in the psychoanalytic tradition and...I have to say--a lot of what I've seen of it so far just strikes me as completely ridiculous. I know there's so much in art and literature and literary theory and so on and so forth that rests on some part of that tradition, it's true, whether on Lacan and so Freud, or Jung, or Eric Erikson (I liked the Richard Sennett book 'The Uses of Disorder' back in the day when I read it, and he spoke about drawing on Erikson, who in turn drew on Anna Freud's writing on childhood, and on her father...), and so I do want to give that worldview a chance to let me understand it in full on ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment