i'm noticing an interesting division on my f'list as regards the reaction posts to michael jackson's death. some are focusing only on the positive aspects of his life: his talent, his music, his charity work. a number of others, though, are focusing only on the negative: the scandal, the self-mutilation, the financial excesses...as though reminding
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
Which is weird. Not because I was a fan of Jackson's; I wasn't. But because the media-fuelled celebrity culture we live in fascinates me. So this ought to be one of those major events that I'm soaking up and watching with interest. And it really just...isn't.
I had to turn the news off tonight because I got so pissed off by the wall-to-wall moonwalking and groin-grabbing.
Last time I felt so exasperated by media coverage of a celebrity death was when Princess Diana died. (I wasn't a fan of hers either.)
I am capable of emotion when public figures die. For instance, I was in pieces over Cobain for a while. And Layne Staley. Oh, and Jeremy Brett -- that one messed me up. So I'd like to think I'm not a completely cold bitch-from-hell.
But my indifference at the death of Michael Jackson (something which I fear says horribly negative things about me as a fellow human being) seems only matched by my irritation at the lack of indifference shown by the Rest of ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment