I have doubts about this writings (sorry). Where, when wa this written and by whom? No one would dare to write about Jesus this way in 1630 without inquisition!.
[It was not writen by a "Cohen" for sure.] Sorry, I don't know who is "Cohen". Maybe if you give me more information (the first name?) I could search about...
[Where, when wa this written and by whom?] It's a secret, sorry. :P I can write that the two, the Parisian and the Venetian, signed those words (and other words) as "Wandering Jew". You know, if I told you who are them, Inquisition could find them and it could be a problem. But I'm glad, 'cause you give me the opportunity to explain - and write about...
[No one would dare to write about Jesus this way in 1630 without inquisition!.] That's right. In 1630 in Paris there was that Prime Minister - a man named Richelieu - that boring Cardinal. Do you know him? I'm sure you know him. Catholic Prime Minister. But, you know, Inquisition inquires. Inquisition loved book burning, and I suppose that it loved heretics burning - but here there aren't books. Here there are sheets with short text, spread among bourgeois and the new aristocratic class. They like these short pamphlets, they
( ... )
[Anyway, FYI, Cohen are the "rabbies".] I thank you, I've learn three new things.
[It was not writen by a "Cohen" for sure.] The authors behind the Wandering Jew aren't Jews. But obviously you didn't know this information - you cannot know a lot of things about these Wandering Jews: they're fiction. Glad to answer to your doubts - it's a chance, I can write about an era, and an idea, that I love - but I think that inquiring a short (and written by me, me and my bad English) writing is useless, because you don't know all the preambles, neither the contest (not the historical contest: the contest of this story). I would be grateful if you inquire the language. (Btw I studied part of Jewish mystique. It's interesting, and it could be useful.)
Second answer: "It was not written by a man of XVII century for sure." :) I'm not able to write in Old English. Anyhow, even if I write in Italian about A.D. 1630, I don't write in Old Italian: readers will be boring.
[Your position sounds like "Plagiarism".] Plagiarism: literary thief, right
( ... )
Given that I'm stupid, and I often misunderstand... I don't understand what you're asking me. Please, write as if I were a brat. Sometimes I need the version for dummies.
Comments 11
I have doubts about this writings (sorry).
Where, when wa this written and by whom?
No one would dare to write about Jesus this way in 1630 without inquisition!.
Please advise.
Reply
Sorry, I don't know who is "Cohen".
Maybe if you give me more information (the first name?) I could search about...
[Where, when wa this written and by whom?]
It's a secret, sorry. :P
I can write that the two, the Parisian and the Venetian, signed those words (and other words) as "Wandering Jew". You know, if I told you who are them, Inquisition could find them and it could be a problem.
But I'm glad, 'cause you give me the opportunity to explain - and write about...
[No one would dare to write about Jesus this way in 1630 without inquisition!.]
That's right.
In 1630 in Paris there was that Prime Minister - a man named Richelieu - that boring Cardinal. Do you know him? I'm sure you know him. Catholic Prime Minister.
But, you know, Inquisition inquires. Inquisition loved book burning, and I suppose that it loved heretics burning - but here there aren't books. Here there are sheets with short text, spread among bourgeois and the new aristocratic class. They like these short pamphlets, they ( ... )
Reply
Anyway, FYI, Cohen are the "rabbies".
About Venice, try Shakespeare "The merchant of Venice", perfect timing and very nice play!.
Anout Richelieu, Plenty to find:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_Richelieu
http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/95sep/richelieu.html
http://www.naples.net/~clutchey/cardinal.htm
Reply
I thank you, I've learn three new things.
[It was not writen by a "Cohen" for sure.]
The authors behind the Wandering Jew aren't Jews. But obviously you didn't know this information - you cannot know a lot of things about these Wandering Jews: they're fiction. Glad to answer to your doubts - it's a chance, I can write about an era, and an idea, that I love - but I think that inquiring a short (and written by me, me and my bad English) writing is useless, because you don't know all the preambles, neither the contest (not the historical contest: the contest of this story). I would be grateful if you inquire the language.
(Btw I studied part of Jewish mystique. It's interesting, and it could be useful.)
Second answer: "It was not written by a man of XVII century for sure." :)
I'm not able to write in Old English. Anyhow, even if I write in Italian about A.D. 1630, I don't write in Old Italian: readers will be boring.
[Your position sounds like "Plagiarism".]
Plagiarism: literary thief, right ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Here in Italian.
Here the same article in English.
1630 BC or A.D. 1630: it's the same.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I don't understand what you're asking me. Please, write as if I were a brat. Sometimes I need the version for dummies.
Reply
Reply
(Disregard my grammar; I've still waken up.)
Reply
Reply
It's my idea, nothing else. :)
Reply
Leave a comment