(Untitled)

[pseudomonas]

██████ ████ ████ ████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ███ ██████ ████ █ █████ ██████████ ██████████████ █████████ █████████████████████████████████ ████ ███████ █████ ██ ██ █ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ █████ █████████

Comments

[cartesiandaemon]

It'll make siphoning a lot more fun! :)

[knirirr]

Huzzah! About time biodiesel started to appear at the pumps.
By co-incidence, I was reading an article about it earlier today whilst waiting at the garage.

biodiesel for cars

[anonymous]

I guess if it should be used for cars it takes ages until they are all produced and substituted. Would be too good if those stinky cars are gone.

Re: biodiesel for cars

[pseudomonas]

It'd be nice if you identified yourself, O anonymous aol-user.

[gerald_duck]

It pisses me off, however, that every time such an innovation is made, they promise "comparable" performance, yet every time the new fuel gives slightly poorer responsiveness and fuel economy. It happened with unleaded versus four-star, then again with low-benzene unleaded, then with ultra-low-sulphur unleaded.

"Super" unleaded nowadays is only about as good as old four star, when they'd have one believe it was comparable to old five star.

I don't believe this discrepancy is ever an inevitable consequence of the change in question; I think the petrol companies are just trying to shaft motorists a little while everyone's watching the environmentalist agenda.