National Right to Life Committee to Endorse Fred Thompson.

Nov 12, 2007 14:56

You may have heard today that Fred Thompson is being endorsed by the National Right to Life. (NRLC) NRLC is the largest pro-life organization that has a great force in politics. They can make or break a candidate in a lot of cases. Usually many people make their decision after hearing what NRLC has to say ( Read more... )

national right to life, polls, news

Leave a comment

Comments 28

so_magical November 13 2007, 06:22:02 UTC
I too was already planning to vote for Fred as he is the better choice I see.

I'm not a single-issue voter either, but certain issues are bigger than others, and the pro-life issue is one of those so it does influence my choices.

Reply

drecat November 13 2007, 06:49:17 UTC
Ditto. I'm by no means a single-issue-voter, but I do have my priorities, and he's spot-on my two primary issues, abortion and national security. So, until the day I find a pro-life, strong national security oriented, education reforming, conservationist, 2nd amendment protecting candidate who also supports gay marriage, it's Fred Thompson for me.

Reply


aliveatolaf November 13 2007, 09:56:34 UTC
This link express some of my worries about Thompson.

http://romancatholicblog.typepad.com/roman_catholic_blog/2007/05/new_concerns_a_.html

Then again, I am not excited about any of the candidates on the Republican side. But I would be more comfortable with McCain on abortion than Thompson.

Reply

natewillsheets November 13 2007, 18:37:20 UTC
Too bad the only people who like McCain are democrat journalists.

Reply

aliveatolaf November 13 2007, 19:10:27 UTC
And Brownback ;)

Reply

so_magical November 15 2007, 04:10:14 UTC
Got that email too did you? :)

Reply


mary_goodnight November 13 2007, 13:56:28 UTC
well he's prolife and not..entirely anti gay marriage.

Why don't we ever have queer friendly and pro life candidates run? would that be so hard?

Reply

phantomdiver November 13 2007, 15:48:29 UTC
It would make a candidate pretty much unelectable, seems to me. Though I would love to see one, too.

Reply

natewillsheets November 13 2007, 18:37:44 UTC
Well, the Republicans aren't really a "queer friendly" party, are they? ;)

Reply

drecat November 13 2007, 20:08:52 UTC
No, but it's sad, because to me, the gay marriage issue and pro-life issue are somewhat...umm...for lack of a better term..."married". Many times from the pro-choice side I get "Who will take care of all the baybeez OMFG?!!?!?!?!!!1111one". I usually shoot back with, "Well, adoption reform, and then allowing gay people to marry and adopt would fix both problems now, wouldn't it? Tons of children + tons of couples who essentially can't have their own children = everyone's happy". Come to think of it, I've never had a response to that...

Reply


la_veuve_chibi November 18 2007, 21:55:43 UTC
My response isn't so much "are they insane?" but rather "I wasn't going to vote for him no matter what, so I don't care."

I was tempted to answer "I'm pro-choice" for the lulz, though. XD

Reply


Leave a comment

Up