I don’t think that criticising an imperfect show is cyber-bullying
I took this more as a comment on all the Gwyneth Paltrow-hate out there. Jezebel regularly has articles about how vapid, privileged, etc she is (and maybe it's true, but who wants to read news articles about that?). But yeah, that ep was pretty boring.
And Lauren is fab, isn't she? So were the t-shirts, haha. And I've been side-eying the Emma storyline as well, ever since she came back after being gone after a few eps. Because I thought when John Stamos first showed up that a very healthy (and, er, interesting) sexual relationship was implied? But Glee is really good at being inconsistent, so I should probably just let that go ; )
I took this more as a comment on all the Gwyneth Paltrow-hate out there.
Oh, I didn't think of that! For me it seemed as if they were just trying to warn The Viewing Kids that an online snark culture has real life consequences, but I felt like I was missing out on that context. It makes more sense that it was about GP.
But yeah, that ep was pretty boring.
I'm glad that I caught up with it on the same night that I watched the next episode rather than live, or I'd have been grumpier.
LAUREN LAUREN LAUREN.
I don't remember what was initially said about Emma and Karl's relationship, but it wouldn't surprise me if the show had gone back on itself. A possible let-out clause is that Emma was implying stuff to make Will jealous or Will was inferring wrongly.
Comments 2
I took this more as a comment on all the Gwyneth Paltrow-hate out there. Jezebel regularly has articles about how vapid, privileged, etc she is (and maybe it's true, but who wants to read news articles about that?). But yeah, that ep was pretty boring.
And Lauren is fab, isn't she? So were the t-shirts, haha. And I've been side-eying the Emma storyline as well, ever since she came back after being gone after a few eps. Because I thought when John Stamos first showed up that a very healthy (and, er, interesting) sexual relationship was implied? But Glee is really good at being inconsistent, so I should probably just let that go ; )
Reply
Oh, I didn't think of that! For me it seemed as if they were just trying to warn The Viewing Kids that an online snark culture has real life consequences, but I felt like I was missing out on that context. It makes more sense that it was about GP.
But yeah, that ep was pretty boring.
I'm glad that I caught up with it on the same night that I watched the next episode rather than live, or I'd have been grumpier.
LAUREN LAUREN LAUREN.
I don't remember what was initially said about Emma and Karl's relationship, but it wouldn't surprise me if the show had gone back on itself. A possible let-out clause is that Emma was implying stuff to make Will jealous or Will was inferring wrongly.
Reply
Leave a comment