I figured this could be good for those who have finished and want to talk without accidentally spoiling the game for those who haven't completed it yet
( Read more... )
About Layton and Descole being brothers, I honestly don't know what to think about it. On one hand, either social services does not exist in Laytonverse, or they are terrible, for the whole "let only one orphan be adobted". Then again, everyone just lets Yula and Tony lives alone too. Also, they don't do anything after the relavation. Sure, Save the World takes more priorities, but has Luke no comments what so ever about that
( ... )
Yeeeah, game tends to be iffy with that stuff :( Or just doesn't think about it. I remember when I finished the last game, I was kind of bothered that nobody thought when they found the river at the bottom (or even if they didn't) to also check nearby towns from the ruins...
I don't recall Bronev saying anything like that.
But yeah, I wish those things had bigger roles as well--heck, now that you bring it up I remember when we first saw the travel aspect of the game, I thought we'd be going to each place to revisit it and was super excited (plus chance of character cameos). Thinking about it again, I'm sad they didn't do that... It would've made more sense with the highlighting at the end of the last game.
Though, even if there was... they never translate the Japanese ones and the company that usually does the guides for Nintendo games here has gotten worse and worse :/
Okay, so there wasn't that much in the guidebook. But Emmy's letter is nice. Pretty sure someone om tumblr translated it, but at least we hear what Emmy is doing post-Azran. There were other things like Bostonia's spec, Raymond likes bug collections and yodeling. That Desmond's glasses are fake. Apparantly the games is set in 20XX, if some of the pictures are to believed. (Is that old news?).
The guidebook is also weird about spoilers. They have no problems mentioning that Layton is adopted, and that he looks like Rachel, but they never outright states that Desmond is Descole although they are clearly referring to that.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't recall Bronev saying anything like that.
But yeah, I wish those things had bigger roles as well--heck, now that you bring it up I remember when we first saw the travel aspect of the game, I thought we'd be going to each place to revisit it and was super excited (plus chance of character cameos). Thinking about it again, I'm sad they didn't do that... It would've made more sense with the highlighting at the end of the last game.
Reply
Is there any 'guidebook' in english, or is that Japan only?
I remember there were some fun trivials there.
Reply
Though, even if there was... they never translate the Japanese ones and the company that usually does the guides for Nintendo games here has gotten worse and worse :/
Reply
There were other things like Bostonia's spec, Raymond likes bug collections and yodeling. That Desmond's glasses are fake. Apparantly the games is set in 20XX, if some of the pictures are to believed. (Is that old news?).
The guidebook is also weird about spoilers. They have no problems mentioning that Layton is adopted, and that he looks like Rachel, but they never outright states that Desmond is Descole although they are clearly referring to that.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment