Warnings and Sim stories

Feb 27, 2010 12:24

 There was an interesting thread last night in Sim_Secret, leading to some interesting discussion on various communities.  Basically, the discussion was about story warnings and whether or not those ought to include portrayals of same-sex relationships.  I wanted to share a few thoughts and see what other people thought, too.

More below the cut. )

communities, legacies, meta, warnings

Leave a comment

Comments 10

lauriempress February 27 2010, 23:28:06 UTC
"But yeah, even in my Squeaky Clean little world, there are going to be some gay and bi people and they are going to lead happy, fulfilled lives as much as anybody else."

And it's your legacy, your story, so that's your prerogative. If they don't like it they can a) skim through that part, b) quit reading, and/or c) shove it. The internet has an on/off switch just like the television. ;)

I personally feel you gave plenty of warning that DG and Brutus could possibly be a couple. It was subtle, but it was there. You gave it in your writing.

About the warnings per se. I really think that should be up to the writer. We as readers reserve the right to stop reading after all. I'm not opposed to writers putting warnings on their work if they choose. But it's their story, their choice.

Lauri

Reply

profbutters February 27 2010, 23:33:37 UTC
Well, to be fair, I DO want to see warnings for things like, um, rape. I really don't want to read that, and that can sneak up in the middle of a story. But, uh . . . that ain't gonna be in my Legacy anytime soon. Or ever. At all.

Reply

lauriempress February 27 2010, 23:56:57 UTC
Well yes, and I thought of that when I was writing my response and then the phone rang, and my husband wanted me to get something out of the garage, so yeah. But yes, things like that I do want to see warnings for, but naive me generally figures those would be covered in com rules. But you are right.

Reply


dumdeedumdumdum February 28 2010, 00:28:36 UTC
I quote:

I had one set of comments from a girl who said "I don't like Emerald because she dated someone else in high school." Got that? ONE date, with ONE other boy, turned my heiress into a sleaze.

Oh, dear.

Even in real life I quite am an uptight person (or so I delude myself to think). I'm not the third sex's biggest fan, I don't approve of PDA, and I am squicked out by pre-marital stuff. BUT I just don't go dissing people who believe in the aforementioned stuff. Heck, one of my friends claims he/she (I'm keeping identity ambiguous) has had pre-marital, and I'm fine with that. Heck, some of my favorite professors in college are gay.

What surprises me is that some people do not have the maturity to stop gagging in public. There are such things as "viewer discretion" and "intelligent readership," after all. Even though I write pathologically moral stuff (in my CW portfolios just as much as in the Sims), I do assume that people know better than to flame the nicely-written unconventional ones (like Lolita, for one).

Reply

profbutters February 28 2010, 04:00:49 UTC
Heh, well, I'm not Vladimir Nabokov. I don't know as much about butterflies, for one thing. I think I just had a brief moment of "Oh, Lordy, if SC has to become more Moral than it already is, I will scream." It's not as though it's going to change radically THIS late in the game.

In nine generations, I have had virtually no out-of-wedlock pregnancies, either. None, actually. Aliens don't count, I think, and Cecilia and Secundus' baby Max was a very unusual exception that proves the rule.

Reply


dumdeedumdumdum February 28 2010, 04:10:13 UTC
Well, my analogy is not fair. ;p SC is indeed no Lolita, but my point is that people really shouldn't go flaming.

And gaaaads, I'd hate it if Max did not happen. Besides, the SC fan can argue that Cecilia really didn't do it outside wedlock, and Max's birth is completely innocent. :)

In the end, it all comes down to whether the read is good, after all. Right?

Reply


strange_tomato February 28 2010, 12:14:28 UTC
Well said. If your story is very much G-rated, then what exactly would you be warning for? This really strips the whole argument for warnings on homosexual content to the bone, because if it's sex that people need warning for, then they can say that without mentioning the sexuality of the participants.

Do people actually comment with reactions like that? I didn't get into it in simsecret, but I was secretly thinking, who are these people who'd react that way? I've never experienced it.

Reply

profbutters February 28 2010, 14:47:18 UTC
*sigh* Boolprop. I love the place and we actually attract some pretty good writers. I think it may be a problem I run into a bit more because I chose certain handicaps. I actually haven't run into much, if any, "OMG TEH GAY!" stuff. We tend to pass each other's characters back and forth and that creates some issues around expectation.

It's more PG than G. But I would be bothered by that one particular storyline needing a warning for "homosexual content," when it was part of a whole story arc during which people re-evaluated their friendships and some fell in love. I didn't feel that one of my couples deserved a warning, while the other two didn't.

Thanks for popping by my journal, by the way!

Reply

strange_tomato February 28 2010, 14:54:11 UTC
Ah, yes... when we talk about characterization and expectations for a certain character, that takes us back to the original use of the term slash, though again, this could be covered by simply saying it is OOC, AU, non-canon, etc.

I agree. To draw attention to that one couple would be very unfair and, I think, inappropriate.

No problem! ^_^ I've been fairly reclusive and inactive in the sims comm lately (as well as reale life, I'll be honest), so it's nice to "get out more" around here. I've always appreciated seeing your thoughtful comments on simsecret, so I'm glad I started following your posts.

Reply


swhedonberry February 28 2010, 19:08:25 UTC
It bugs the heck out of me that you would be expected to put warnings for homosexuality in your stories. If a person has problems with it, they need to not play the game, truthfully. With no hacks and just the basic game, sims can engage in nearly the same activities surrounding love and affection. Which is my way of saying a friendly "suck it!" to your detractors ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up