"Students who participated in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely to have sex as those who did not..."Different things work for different kids. All my friends in high school were sexually active. I wasn't. Kids will and will not have sex according to who they are and what they think they're ready for. There are now TWO WHOLE cycles of
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Doh ...
Reply
I wonder how many of those students are now pregnant or have STI's vs. those that had actual sex ed?
Reply
So there is no "control" group to study here, unless you compare the kids now to the kids in our generation, who were the last group to get comprehensive sex ed. But even that is sketchy, as we grew up in a slightly different time than those kids did, and the difference between pre- and post- 9/11 I think could make a difference in how kids relate to sex.
Reply
I can't remember the sources of the information, but some schools are relinquishing the federal funding and returning to comprehensive sex-ed. This program isn't, technically speaking, mandatory. It's only required if you want the money, which is a sly way of controlling educational choices in schools that can't afford to operate without the funding.
Reply
My kids will have comprehensive sex-education whether they get it in school or not. I plan on having all kinds of informative books on a bottom-shelf of the back corner of a bookshelf in the house, and after showing them it exists, I'll *never* take inventory of the shelf again.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Then again, Erin, Alicia, Jessica and Nic and all the rest of those Drama people could've been making it up.
Skupin and most of them IB boys had girlfriends for a reason.
Those were the people I ran with in high school. Come to think of it - Tong might've been an exceptin to that. But everyone else was either having sex or talking good shop.
Reply
Leave a comment