Death Proof

Oct 05, 2007 11:58

My flatmates and I went to see the new Quentin Tarantino film, Death Proof, last night. In this off-beat thriller, Tarantino turns his trademark blend of hip dialogue and beautifully-shot ultraviolence to the world of pure mathematics. Kurt Russell stars as an embittered former number theorist who plots revenge on the profession that wronged him by ( Read more... )

maths, film

Leave a comment

Comments 19

half_of_monty October 5 2007, 11:15:57 UTC
Tarantino turns his trademark blend of hip dialogue and beautifully-shot ultraviolence to the world of pure mathematics.

i.e. Tarantino is writing a film for pozorvlak.

Actually, from your summary of the plot, it sounds like he pinched it from the fabulous half-written play, ``Harry Potter and the Hodge Apple'', in which a tram, hijacked to Vladivostok, ends up washing the proof of the Hodge conjecture off the blackboard as it surfs down the river Liffey - at which point the conjecture ceases to be true and magic enters the world.

Now I come to think about it, that was a marvellous play. I should get back in touch with people and finish it!

Reply

pozorvlak October 5 2007, 11:18:35 UTC
Er, not quite...

Reply

half_of_monty October 5 2007, 11:20:08 UTC
Aw.

*headdesk*

Snigger.

Reply

half_of_monty October 5 2007, 11:23:09 UTC
Mind you your version sounds better.

Do you think there's a market in Edinburgh for insane pure maths based thriller? Sounds like we have a lot of good ingrediants between us.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

pozorvlak October 5 2007, 12:04:32 UTC
It would also, I think, make her the first female Fields Medallist (but not the first New Zealander).

Reply

half_of_monty October 5 2007, 13:48:47 UTC
Oh yes. What rubbishness.

Why doesn't Claire Voisin have one?

Reply

pozorvlak October 5 2007, 14:26:12 UTC
Institutional sexism?

FWIW, I've never heard of her, but then I don't work in algebraic geometry.

Reply


elvum October 5 2007, 18:01:46 UTC
I've been planning to boycott the European release of the two halves of Grindhouse in fury at the studios trampling over the artistic vision of two directors I respect - should I reconsider? :-)

Reply

pozorvlak October 5 2007, 21:05:40 UTC
Hmmmm. The trouble with that, it seems to me, is that the studios are more likely to interpret it as "nobody wanted to see your stupid film anyway, Quentin/Robert, you're all washed up". Clamour for the release of the double-bill DVD or something :-)

The thing is, I'm a slavish admirer of all of Tarantino's work, so I'm kinda the wrong person to ask. But yeah, I'd go and see it: it's not as good as Pulp Fiction or Reservoir Dogs, but it's up there with Jackie Brown.

Reply


shuripentu October 8 2007, 09:35:25 UTC
Ooh, I might just have to go see that, then. I've generally been skeptical of films with maths in and not bothered seeing most of them, but that might be because the only one I did watch was Good Will Hunting and I got rather annoyed at the "incredibly difficult, unsolved graph theory problem". *rolls eyes* :p

Reply

pozorvlak October 8 2007, 10:14:50 UTC
Er, not quite. I'm rather astonished that two people have fallen for that...

The film's still worth seeing, mind.

Reply

shuripentu October 8 2007, 14:15:01 UTC
Well, stranger films have been made so it's not too far out. :)

Reply

pozorvlak October 8 2007, 21:15:22 UTC
My friend Richard had an idea for a film to be called Final Analysis, about a Banach space theorist whose children are kidnapped by Colombian drug lords, and who vows revenge.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up