There was a story on the radio this morning about
a NATO official claiming that Kabul was safer for children than London, New York or Glasgow. This was followed by the usual predictable stream of denunciations and cries of what an appalling thing this was to say. But nobody directly addressed the truth of the statement. And I'd really like to know
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
Agree with you about the journalism, though. No idea how much of the problem is culture, how much is just that they are throwing these articles together in not much more time than we spend grumbling about them on LJ.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The trouble is that this wasn't a statistical claim, as such. What parameters should be included or not-included? Disease, car-related, murder/infanticide, or simply violent deaths on the streets.
Yes, excellent point. On the other hand, I've been going through the UN stats site oedipamass49 linked to, and I don't think there's a way of comparing like with like that makes the UK come out worse...
Reply
So, even under the most charitable interpretation of Sedwill's claims, he's wrong by a factor of 40.
Reply
Leave a comment