This article from The Economist on California's over-regulation of artisanal food vendors reminded me a bit about Joel Salatin's criticisms of regulation that is designed for large companies and ridiculous for small ones: Beware of the yogurt.
I understand the desire to have standards for food safety, given all the cases of contamination of various sorts in recent years, but they're going about it in a really counter-productive way.
Note to government: when we said we wanted a consumer protection board, we meant about corrupt credit cards, sleazy mortgages, and bogus banking practices.
I think that ensuring safe food is also a reasonable purview of government. But if someone wants to, e.g., make yogurt out of already-pasteurized milk, it's stupid to make her follow regulations for raw milk. And mandating practices instead of results (that is, specifying materials and procedures instead of contaminant-free outcomes) favors the big corporation over the little guy.
I think the idea is that if the procedures are in place, the outcome will be safe. I am supportive of government regulation, and often times regulation comes from consumers asking for it (thinking of Organics especially) but the way it works out isn't always what we would like.
Comments 4
I understand the desire to have standards for food safety, given all the cases of contamination of various sorts in recent years, but they're going about it in a really counter-productive way.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment