Because the other guy wanted that imperialist war effort along with the other imperialist war effort, which is now at least slowly winding down. Also, imperialist war efforts are not the only measure of a candidate.
If someone came up to you and offered you two bowlfuls of faeces, would you get out your spoon and weigh the pros and cons of each or just say "no thanks"?
In a presidential election, in the US, in the current era, the only serious choices are:
-- The Republican -- The Democrat -- Move somewhere else
Voting for someone other than the two candidates marginally increases the likelihood that, at some point in the future, there will be more than two viable candidates, but in 2008, one of {McCain|Obama} was going to win.
I agree. I voted for Obama because, of the candidates on the ballot (including the third party ones), he was the one I felt most aligned with, not because I didn't want McCain to win.
(The comment has been removed)
I probably wouldn't handle it the same was that Obama has, but it's what he said he was going to do.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
-- The Republican
-- The Democrat
-- Move somewhere else
Voting for someone other than the two candidates marginally increases the likelihood that, at some point in the future, there will be more than two viable candidates, but in 2008, one of {McCain|Obama} was going to win.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment