So, as far as I can tell from my reading about acupuncture studies, the higher the quality of the study, the less benefit "real" acupuncture has over sham acupuncture. Traditional acupuncture points are no better than randomly chosen acupuncture points, and twirled toothpicks are just as effective as needles sticking into your body
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
If so, wouldn't that apply to any placebo study: the more impressive the placebo, the better results it will give?
Looking at drugs as an easier example, what would really make the point would be the real drug packaged like a dodgy supplement and given causally -- vs the placebo packaged like a real drug and given with great seriousness. If the real drug still gets better results, then you've got something.
Reply
Acupuncture is all placebo. But it does have a very strong placebo response. The only stronger type of placebo is placebo surgery. Pills are a weaker placebo, but size and colour of pill will vary the strength of the placebo response. (Which leaves me thinking that homeopaths have it all wrong with their tiny white sugar pills. They should give people huge red sugar pills.) And with subjective conditions that are purely a pain sensation, there is often little benefit over placebo for any medical intervention. Hopefully that will improve in time.
Reply
Leave a comment