I don't know what you mean by "pming software". Forgive me if I have violated some journal etiquette. I am simply trying to establish dialogue on the concept that everything is information expressed with math based terms. One of the reasons I think this is that don juan of castenada fame states that reality isn't really real, but real enough to support the efforts of one who seeks knowledge and power, and who also said that the universe is built of "fibres" which can be used for flight. This was my introduction to the concept of string theory.........fibres can be equated with strings. I think these fibres or "strings" are strings of numbers....the basic component of stuff. There are many other reasons building upon these early readings including personal experiences related to the quasi-illogical underpinnings of extant reality. The last 100 years of physics seems to flesh out the ideas of the mexican sorcerers, in their peyote fueled dreamings, well ahead of the european physics community.
I think he means you could have sent me a "Private Message" instead of posting in the physics community.
I get the sense you are pretty new to the internet or at least online communities, discussion groups, etc.?
Probably not the place, here in the physics group, to be discussing the likes of Castaneda's works.
And I think the term is "universal filaments."
Don't be fooled, though: numbers seem to be the creation of people and do not seem present in nature.
That said, there appears to be number-like entities in nature, but they seem as pseudo-objects without shape or definitive form: numbers appear to be real insofar as they seem omnipresent, yet exist nowhere, and take the shape they need to in order to be identified as such. They seem, in a sense, as place holders or positions in a structure. How an observer views a given structure decides which objects will become which numbers: it seems a relational means of both manifestation and identification
( ... )
Comments 3
Reply
Reply
I get the sense you are pretty new to the internet or at least online communities, discussion groups, etc.?
Probably not the place, here in the physics group, to be discussing the likes of Castaneda's works.
And I think the term is "universal filaments."
Don't be fooled, though: numbers seem to be the creation of people and do not seem present in nature.
That said, there appears to be number-like entities in nature, but they seem as pseudo-objects without shape or definitive form: numbers appear to be real insofar as they seem omnipresent, yet exist nowhere, and take the shape they need to in order to be identified as such. They seem, in a sense, as place holders or positions in a structure. How an observer views a given structure decides which objects will become which numbers: it seems a relational means of both manifestation and identification ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment