(Untitled)

Oct 20, 2008 12:13

California voters (those of you who read this journal), come election day, vote no on Prop. 8. I'll outline some points below, but I promise to try to avoid a "ripple of evil" lecture:
  1. Claim: If Prop. 8 does not pass, then churches will lose their tax exempt status.
    • Fact: No, they won't. Churches haven't lost their tax exempt status as is (before ( Read more... )

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 5

splir October 20 2008, 20:13:06 UTC
You know who else used argumentum ad personam, Hitler.

and thus I reenact every argument on the internet. Personally I don't like the way the bill is worded. I don't like how much attention its getting and how people are paying more attention to this then to some of the important bills that need more attention.

Reply

phycokrusk October 20 2008, 20:24:05 UTC
On that, I will certainly agree.

I do think it's important that this Prop. gets attention, because at it's core it is unconstitutional (and let's face it; limiting the rights of one group of people is the first step towards limiting the rights of all people).

But at the same time, it doesn't stand to cost us $20 billion.

Reply

splir October 20 2008, 20:34:22 UTC
Also even should the people of California vote let this bill pass, it probably will be declared unconstitutional by a judge minutes after its signed. Kind of like when it was first passed back in 2000? or so.

btw i found the artist who did your icon, and there are more of them....

Reply

phycokrusk October 20 2008, 21:18:01 UTC
Fer srs?

I would like a link, plz.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up