Saw The Great Raid yesterday.
I was actually fairly impressed. I thought the bits leading up to the raid dragged a bit, there was this big subplot taking up about half the screen time about Maggie Utinsky's smuggling ring, which was just distracting.
The rest was very well done. The raid itself was excellent, very accurate, with the
(
Read more... )
Comments 30
On the Hiroshima point, do you think we can defeat the Islamic Jhadists without nuking Mecca?
Reply
Right into the interlocked fields of fire of two watercooledBrowning .30s.
On the Hiroshima point, do you think we can defeat the Islamic Jhadists without nuking Mecca?
You know, that would be an excellent experiment, but I'm not sure I want to see it carried out. On one hand, the hajj is one of the seven pillars, if you don't do it, your salvation is in doubt. And on the other hand, Islam is very fatalist, so if Mecca and that big meteor vanish in a ball of nuclear plasma, well, obviously Allah wanted it to happen that way. But on the gripping hand, that sure could be a lot of really pissed-off (justifiably so, too) Muslims.
Reply
Reply
Reply
You know, I'm sure rangers carry mortars if they expect the op to require them -- not sure about the 60mm though. I thought it would be the 42.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I would recommend people rent it, then just watch the ending.
My review.
Reply
Development Executive: This movie would sell better if it had some women in it.
Writer: But every character's a soldier.
DE: How about you put in a sexy machine-gun toting commando? That would be hot.
W: That's a terrible idea.
DE: Okay, okay. Add a subplot that involves a sexy woman in Manilla.
W: Well, I guess there were some women in the Filipino resistance.
DE: Make sure she's white.
Well, it's not like they made her up. But yah, I agree with you: there's a lot of nothing happening until stuff starts to happen. They really should have dropped that entire subplot and dealt with the intelligence gathering, the Fillipino guerillas, and so forth.
Reply
Reply
And 'operational disaster'? Diverting to a secondary target in the event the primary was visually obscured was how things were done, and the bomb detonated midway between two Mitsubishi arms factories.
Reply
I was more referring to the launch with knowledge of defective fuel tanks, highly irregular (and against all safety regulation) last minute soldering of the assembled bomb, and the intent on part of the crew to drop the bomb blind over Nagasaki; that it took out arms factories was nothing but luck, the crew targetted a stadium in a last minute hole in the clouds.
That's operational disaster, even if the *results* were lucky, and took out the majority of the west friendly population of Japan ...
Reply
How can you have a 'highly irregular' occurrence when what you're doing has never been done before? It was either solder it at last minute or risk detonation on a failed takeoff; 'one-point safe' wasn't even in the vocabulary yet.
and the intent on part of the crew to drop the bomb blind over Nagasaki
They were going to drop it on radar, not blind.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment