(Untitled)

Dec 19, 2011 23:47

...What's the plural of apocalypse?

reno [v2], ami mizuno [v2], yuffie kisaragi [v1], primo (keiichi maebara) [v2], tseng [v1]

Leave a comment

Comments 142

waterfell December 20 2011, 04:51:48 UTC
[Guess who studies English?]

Apocalypses. [Complete with spelling.] A p o c a l y p s e s.

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 20 2011, 05:07:47 UTC
[He was pretty sure they'd never actually NEED it though.]

Oh. I don't believe it's a good thing I need to know that.

Reply

waterfell December 20 2011, 05:16:04 UTC
Why do you need to?

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 05:18:27 UTC
I have a bad feeling we're headed towards one. Again.

Reply


tasercopter December 20 2011, 06:00:28 UTC
Sephiroth.

[Ha ha, good one, right?]

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 05:01:24 UTC
Jenova, if we're being technical.

[No. Not really.]

Reply

tasercopter December 21 2011, 05:04:27 UTC
Same difference. [Reno is not going to get into a Jenova vs. Sephiroth debate.]

We're not being technical, it's a joke.

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 05:27:48 UTC
Now isn't the time for jokes.

Reply


promotedpawn December 20 2011, 13:54:15 UTC
Last time I checked it was "apocalypses". But if it's about that there's no real need for a plural.

[Not for him, eat least.]

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 05:15:23 UTC
About what?

Reply

promotedpawn December 21 2011, 06:46:31 UTC
About the end of things, death and destruction without stop. Isn't that why one would need such a word?

Reply

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 07:27:30 UTC
Everything ends eventually.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

plotdeviceturk December 21 2011, 05:17:14 UTC
We had Meteor, and now there's... whatever this is.

[Apparently not for the planet, it likes throwing apocalypses at humanity.]

Reply


Leave a comment

Up