Anyone read(ing) Pygmy?

May 05, 2009 19:48

Was it as disappointing for you as it was for me?

Leave a comment

Comments 24

blueblindbee May 6 2009, 03:13:47 UTC
No negative energyyy!! aahhh I want to enjoy his new book without preconceived thoughts. lol.

I hope it's not bad. I'll start it tomorrow...

Reply

lheannon May 6 2009, 05:32:58 UTC
It's terrible, but honestly if you don't want bad thoughts avoid the communities. I'm a huge Palahniuk fan, but this book honestly blows. I'm several chapters in and having a really hard time going on.

Reply

blueblindbee May 6 2009, 15:20:50 UTC
You're right.

And I hope you're wrong. (Although, popular vote says you're right. oh jeez.)

Reply


jessicafftheii May 6 2009, 03:24:36 UTC
I went to Borders to buy it. While in line I started reading it and... I dunno. I just skimmed a couple of lines but I decided I'd wait and hear what people thought of Pygmy before buying it.

I ended up getting Rant, haha.

Reply

lheannon May 6 2009, 05:37:25 UTC
Good Choice my Friend. I was pleasantly surprised by Rant, Pygmy makes me want to burn my eyeballs out with hot sticks. As someone who has always respected Palahniuk, I'm confused by what he's chosen to do with the grammar.

I'm sticking with my theory that he's laughing at us.

Reply

jessicafftheii May 7 2009, 03:26:09 UTC
I do plan on reading it one day, but from what I've read about the book I think I'll wait until it's in paperback form or something.

Reply


metasynthesthia May 6 2009, 05:13:08 UTC
New book?! Oh man I forgot!

Reply


lheannon May 6 2009, 05:30:37 UTC
I'm struggling through it.

This is the sentence I'm currently on (Don't worry, no spoliers BECAUSE IT MAKES NO SENSE):

"During mating ritual cloaked dim interior arena atop floor of basketball wood, against din of music encourage premature random sexual reproduction, pig dog brother make finger straight to indicate females ranked along opposite wall. Across distance, give introduce."

It's like he's laughing at us. As if he's deliberately written something terrible so that he can laugh at us for buying it. The really sad thing is that the writing would have taken so much work, you can tell, with all the little nuances that he put a lot into it. But, it's so BAD!

Reply

time_freak May 6 2009, 08:31:20 UTC
it sounds like its written in speech, ie the characters thinks and speaks like this. Like in trainspotting or other books that do this. I haven't read any of this but I guess the character himself cannot speak or read well?

Reply

lheannon May 6 2009, 16:23:41 UTC
That's exactly what he's trying to do, but it's done to the point where the book is barely readable.

The frustrating part is that the character who's writing the book writes perfect grammar when other character's are talking, when he's quoting them. So he understands perfect grammar when it's said to him, I believe the bad grammar is deliberate (I'll be giving away parts of the story if I go any further), but there's better ways to go about it than making the story nearly incomprehensible.

When the other characters have dialogue it actually feels like a moment to breathe.

Reply

xdenverxmaxx May 6 2009, 22:40:32 UTC
please tell me this doesnt go on for the whole book. i was at least hoping his grammar gets better further into the book.

Reply


wyrmis May 6 2009, 06:26:55 UTC
But...but...but... the jacket says it's his best since Fight Club. Surely the jacket never lies!

I'm going to read it after I finish Crash (Ballard) and maybe before or maybe after I read Ape-Shit (Mellick). Then, I am going to go and read happy things with happy puppy dogs for a couple of days.

Reply

lheannon May 6 2009, 16:25:07 UTC
Yeah, I literally laughed out loud at that. Best since Fight Club...

You know, under all the crappy sentence structure and deliberately bad grammar there might be a good story, but no one will ever find it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up