Rather tragically, Giddens' attempt at just one of 'us'/real MEN connection through wrestling ends with this: Even more ridiculous, when there is a commercial break, the programme solemnly informs the viewer, "Whatever you do, don't try this at home." Do they seriously think people would?
which seems to place him far further outside than merely being a sociologist. But I do rather love the mathematician who sorted his football team by getting them to play in prime numbers.
I hate to admit it, but I quite enjoyed Roger Scruton's response.
he secret highbrow intellectual interests (sneaking into the opera heavily disguised, hiding Wittgenstein inside the cover of a chicklit novel...) of people who are celebrated for their, er, non-cerebral achievements? (Or don't they have them?)
There was the Chelsea footballer who read the Gaurdian, but that doesn't quite count, I don't think.
I refuse to feel guilty about any of my pleasures. Not even boxed macaroni and cheese or lustfully reading real-estare ads. I used to read seed catalogues like porn, too, but that pleasure was based on the contrast between the pages of voluptuous fruit and flowers and the deep snow and cold of winter. Last date of frost where I grew up: June 15. Most years around here we don't have any frost at all, and the roses bloom twelve months a year.
I may be some timeoursinFebruary 3 2007, 14:53:56 UTC
There's a lovely piece by Katherine Whitehorn about sitting snuggled up by a nice warm fire with a cup of tea or something stronger, and reading books about Antarctic exploration.
Re: I may be some timewordweaverlynnFebruary 3 2007, 17:19:10 UTC
I haven't run across that piece; I'll have to look for it. I have a lifelong fascination with Antarctic (and Arctic) exploration, and I adore Katherine Whitehorn.
I was tickled to notice, last time I saw "Help!", that the Beatles brought up Oates as an example of admirable self-sacrifice. It was an offhand reference with no explanation; clearly they assumed that everybody would know who Oates was and why he was worth mentioning.
If I felt guilty about anything, it wouldn't be a pleasure.
I love country music, but not the same stuff Stanley Fish does, nor for the same reasons (I like its politiical subversiveness; they way it's on the side of working men, prisoners, outsiders, fallen women - at least the strand of it that I listen to, which is basically Cash-Nelson-Jennings-Harris-Parton). I wouldn't even think of feeling guilty about it.
Comments 17
Even more ridiculous, when there is a commercial break, the programme solemnly informs the viewer, "Whatever you do, don't try this at home." Do they seriously think people would?
which seems to place him far further outside than merely being a sociologist. But I do rather love the mathematician who sorted his football team by getting them to play in prime numbers.
Reply
he secret highbrow intellectual interests (sneaking into the opera heavily disguised, hiding Wittgenstein inside the cover of a chicklit novel...) of people who are celebrated for their, er, non-cerebral achievements? (Or don't they have them?)
There was the Chelsea footballer who read the Gaurdian, but that doesn't quite count, I don't think.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Anyway, what's so guilt-worthy about baseball?
Reply
Reply
I was tickled to notice, last time I saw "Help!", that the Beatles brought up Oates as an example of admirable self-sacrifice. It was an offhand reference with no explanation; clearly they assumed that everybody would know who Oates was and why he was worth mentioning.
Reply
I love country music, but not the same stuff Stanley Fish does, nor for the same reasons (I like its politiical subversiveness; they way it's on the side of working men, prisoners, outsiders, fallen women - at least the strand of it that I listen to, which is basically Cash-Nelson-Jennings-Harris-Parton). I wouldn't even think of feeling guilty about it.
Reply
Leave a comment