Finally someone has decided to do the hard econometric number-crunching on
whether getting a hybrid car saves you money.
The conclusion, surprisingly, is not really:
it is painfully obvious that existing hybrids lack the ability to make up for their steep prices with gas savings. While a hybrid would present significant savings over something like
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
(The comment has been removed)
(although, if you're commuting on I-66 into the District, you should be shot, since the Metro is a far better alternative.)
I also have anecdotal evidence that hybrids are exempt from all or most of the personal-property tax on cars, but I can't find any official pronouncement on the 'net to that effect. Worth asking someone with a hybrid in VA.
Reply
The HOV lane deal is supposedly illegal under the eyes of the federal government and was supposed to expire this year. I don't know what happened with that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
In contrast, tailpipe emissions waft everywhere. There is an emerging academic literature on the public health costs of local atmospheric pollution, which presumably increases with the total amount of petroleum burned. NOx, unburned hydrocarbons, and fine suspended particulates, added up over thousands of tailpipes, makes for some pretty potent smog in many places of the world. DC is a pretty clean area in this regard; when I left London, I felt like I'd given up smoking. Manila is even worse ( ... )
Reply
Before we started removing lots of resources from the earth's crust, there were deposits of minerals and other here and there, some of them toxic such as oil. There really is no difference between having an iron ore deposit in northern Michigan and having a junk yard in Texas.
Reply
Leave a comment