I'm not gonna freak out I'm not gonna freak out I'm not gonna freak out I'm not gonna --
FUCK THAT. I'M FREAKING OUT.
(For those who don't know me, this is important because of Star Trek: First Contact and the fact humanity achieves warp speed on April 4th, 2063, and I'll be 69, and if it goes the way it's supposed to (minus the Borg and WWIII, of course), Zephram Cochran is only a tad bit younger than me (he looks mid sixties/late fifties in the movie).
Me too. Seriously, I get so freaking excited about it, but then I wonder if the the already present differences between our timeline and the Trek timelines will throw everything off. Like, we didn't have the Eugenics Wars in the nineties, and we don't appear to be on our way toward that rather dystopian picture First Contact painted...
Surely supernova observations rule this out? Neutrinos from 1987A were observed about three hours before the light signal, but that's because the neutrinos come straight from the core, while the light has to work its way out.
But even if they were simultaneous and the neutrinos travelled faster than light, 3 hours out of a 168,000 year trip is a much tinier difference than what was measured here (60 ns difference over a 2.4 ms course)
Comments 21
FUCK THAT. I'M FREAKING OUT.
(For those who don't know me, this is important because of Star Trek: First Contact and the fact humanity achieves warp speed on April 4th, 2063, and I'll be 69, and if it goes the way it's supposed to (minus the Borg and WWIII, of course), Zephram Cochran is only a tad bit younger than me (he looks mid sixties/late fifties in the movie).
Somebody, put on "Magic Carpet Ride"!!!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Shit just got real.gif!
Reply
Reply
But even if they were simultaneous and the neutrinos travelled faster than light, 3 hours out of a 168,000 year trip is a much tinier difference than what was measured here (60 ns difference over a 2.4 ms course)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment