Leave a comment

Comments 8

evelynwordsmyth November 15 2010, 01:08:06 UTC
Whelp, guess I'm fucked then.

Reply


owlsie November 15 2010, 02:09:54 UTC
it seems like people who have the patience/skill to deal with numbers would be better with money is kind of logical

Reply

thelilyqueen November 15 2010, 02:17:39 UTC
I'd say a lot of it is education, too, and its eventual effects on socioeconomic status. There are always exceptions but if you didn't get through algebra, you're probably not fully numerate and you're probably not going into better-paying career fields.

Reply

owlsie November 15 2010, 02:28:26 UTC
i have dyscalculia, i can barely manage times tables...

I will prove you all wrong and rule the world O_O

Reply

thelilyqueen November 15 2010, 02:36:39 UTC
Well, there are exceptions, of course. :) Just saying, most medical schools require calculus, business programs require business math courses...

Reply


lunabird November 15 2010, 08:38:16 UTC
Little bit automatically skeptical of RAND -- they're known for their conservative bias. The fact that it was originated by economists also gives me pause -- of course, I'd need to see their actual methodology before I discount the study. But, I'm automatically slightly worried that there's an underlying attitude here of "People who make more money are just BETTER than the rest" along with the implication that income is due to math skills -- not the other way around, or due to an unmeasured or incorrectly controlled for variable*. Thus, why I'd need to see the methods and whatever charts give me a looksie at the actual data, but, my spider senses are tingling and thus I'm hesitant to accept the claims made at face value ( ... )

Reply


why am I not rich? bec_87rb November 17 2010, 18:12:57 UTC
I have been better at numbers than both of my spouses.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up