What a pretentious asshole. This man is not a goddamn painting to be analyzed by art students. He is a man who doesn't want to live another 20 years or more locked in his body. So unless there is a cure on the horizon, he should be allowed to end his own mental and emotionally suffering. His problem isn't something that will get better with time. It will stay the same.
This is not about a man being "put to death." This is about a man with a disease that many consider the stuff of nightmares being denied bodily autonomy just because some schmuck thinks his suffering is ~*~inspirational~*~ and ~*~aesthetically pleasing~*~.
Is that someone who should be put to death, however "good" the intentions?
"Put to death" and "allowed to die" are not the same thing here.
This poor man knows what he wants, and any person with a heart understands WHY that's what he wants.
What's "monstrous" is to turn him into a symbol or any other abstraction rather than the human being he is: a man who has lost the ability to live as he pleases, and is now seeking the right to die when he pleases.
Comments 34
The comments at the source are excellent, at least as far as i read.
Reply
Reply
This is not about a man being "put to death." This is about a man with a disease that many consider the stuff of nightmares being denied bodily autonomy just because some schmuck thinks his suffering is ~*~inspirational~*~ and ~*~aesthetically pleasing~*~.
Reply
Yes, it sounds like his life is SO marvellous. ia, OP, he's not a fucking display or object lesson. He's a person who deserves to decide his own fate.
Reply
"Put to death" and "allowed to die" are not the same thing here.
This poor man knows what he wants, and any person with a heart understands WHY that's what he wants.
What's "monstrous" is to turn him into a symbol or any other abstraction rather than the human being he is: a man who has lost the ability to live as he pleases, and is now seeking the right to die when he pleases.
Reply
Leave a comment