Nuclear Truckers: The Axles of Evil?

Feb 15, 2012 12:19

Big rigs with bombs are secretly cruising the interstate near you. But how safe are they from terrorists or accidents?

-By Adam Weinstein | Wed Feb. 15, 2012


Read more... )

usa, nuclear weapons

Leave a comment

Comments 33

crossfire February 15 2012, 19:40:06 UTC
Semi-OT: this particular topic once resulted in one of the funniest headlines I've ever seen, this must have been ~15 years ago now. There was a trainload of nuclear waste on its way to a storage facility, and it was going to be passing very near the small town of Thermal, California. The residents of Thermal were quite upset about this, and the resulting newspaper article was headlined, "Thermal Nuclear Train Reaction".

Reply

squeeful February 15 2012, 19:45:42 UTC
You know that editor was walking around for months with a huge grin on their faces for getting to use that headline.

Reply

lickety_split February 17 2012, 04:09:00 UTC
LMAO!

Reply


13chapters February 15 2012, 19:47:59 UTC
In 2010, DOE inspectors were tipped off to alcohol abuse among the truckers. They identified 16 alcohol-related incidents between 2007 and 2009, including one in which agents were detained by local police at a bar after they'd stopped for the night with their atomic payload. After several agents and contractors were caught bringing unauthorized guns on training missions in Nevada between 2001 and 2004, DOE inspectors determined that "firearms policies and procedures were systematically violated." One OST agent in Texas pled guilty in 2006 to trying to sell body armor, rifle scopes, machine gun components, and other assault gear he'd pilfered on the job.HOLY SHIT ( ... )

Reply

squeeful February 15 2012, 19:59:32 UTC
Highly unlikely. The routes in the map above are part of the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. They're federal, not local or state roads.

Santa Cruz is bypassed because of its geography, not because they declared themselves "nuclear free". Highways 17 and 101 going through the Santa Cruz area are narrow, windy, with sharp turns, steep inclines and banks, and unlike 5 are not designed to maximize traffic flow. Nuclear trucks (and a lot of trucks in general) don't go through there because it's too hazardous, not because it's what the inhabitants want.

Reply

13chapters February 15 2012, 20:02:35 UTC
THAT'S WHAT I SAID TO MY COWORKER.

Sorry for the caps, it was a very annoying conversation. (My coworker is a very annoying person, tbh. She insisted she knew better because I wasn't even born yet when Santa Cruz declared itself nuclear free and she was. I went to UC Santa Cruz and know the geography pretty damned well, her whole story made no freaking sense to me.)

Reply

squeeful February 15 2012, 20:05:36 UTC
Lol, it's okay!

She can take her self-centeredness and stick it where the sun doesn't shine and the granola won't go.

Reply


tabaqui February 15 2012, 20:03:39 UTC
Bleh. Considering the amount of truck accidents on the highway that goes right through central Missouri, i'm not sanguine about any of this. I wish they'd just get rid of the damn things. We have, what, over eight thousand? How can that be considered even *remotely* sane?

*will totally skip the 'the US is the only country to bomb another country with nucks and we need to stfu and sit down before our hypocrisy suffocates us' stuff*

**sort of**

Reply


intrikate88 February 15 2012, 20:08:47 UTC
Oh, hey, that looks like I-75 coming through Atlanta there! AWESOME!

But then, I grew up in Marietta, and heard from a couple different places that if I knew about what the chemical plants there were doing, I'd be trying to move off the continent. I still don't know what they're doing there, but it sounds like if any significant accident happens, I'll have several interesting ways to have my face melt off.

Reply

farchivist February 15 2012, 20:36:47 UTC
I will bet money that they're forced to detour on I285 around the core. I wonder what would happen if there's one of those massive accidents during the rush hour?

Reply

intrikate88 February 15 2012, 21:43:19 UTC
Oh, for sure. I didn't see any stopping points in ATL on that map so with 18-wheelers they'd be forced to take the Loop.

As for an accident... well I suppose we'd have more than rogue zebras running down 285.

Reply


magicpebble February 15 2012, 20:20:16 UTC
I feel like this was part of a plot on 24.

Clearly there needs to be better oversight of these drivers. Nuclear materials and big rigs have their own independent hazards, but combined...

Reply

freuen February 15 2012, 21:43:22 UTC
Season 7 if I'm remembering correctly. (Except I think the weapons in question were biological and not nuclear.)

Reply

wrestlingdog February 16 2012, 01:49:13 UTC
Pretty sure West Wing had a subplot very much like this in the 3rd season...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up