David Cameron: Not Incompatible To Cut Police and Beef Up Policing.

Aug 11, 2011 22:16

UK riots: David Cameron defends police cuts in Commons sitting

PM says cuts programme will free up frontline police officers as he unveils post-riot security measures in emergency sitting

David Cameron has dismissed Labour calls for a rethink on government plans to impose cuts of 20% on the police as he addressed an emergency sitting of the House ( Read more... )

stupid people, money, economy, uk: conservative / tories, uk riots, police, david cameron

Leave a comment

Comments 10

ceilidh_ann August 11 2011, 22:06:41 UTC
I'd call this willful ignorance but to be honest, I think it's just straight up cruelty now. I've spent far too long trying to think of an appropriate insult to call him but the truth is always the best - David Cameron is a fucking Tory.

Twitter folks - try to get #FuckCameron trending!

Reply


devilstay August 11 2011, 22:20:08 UTC
I really can't emphasis enough, how much I hate you David Cameron.I regret, ever wondering why you didn't come back, quicker from your holiday. I should have known, that when things get bad, your presence could only make things worse. You should have stayed on your holiday, and made it a priority to forgot ever coming back, we have enough criminals, without you running amok as well.

Reply


tartary_lamb August 11 2011, 23:21:15 UTC
I'll admit, I tend to be sympathetic toward law enforcement more often than not, but the idea that the government could shut down social networking at a whim scares the crap out of me.

That's... I mean, that's a nightmare scenario. When governments tried to pull that sort of stunt during the Arab Spring, there was an uproar heard round the world. How is this okay?!

Reply

red_pill August 12 2011, 06:19:34 UTC
as far i as i can tell, its not shutting down socal networks, but cutting pertcueler people from socal networks. the same thing hit slash dot, and that was the consueses there.

Reply

tartary_lamb August 12 2011, 15:31:12 UTC
That's a bit less unconscionable, but from a practical standpoint the decision of who qualifies as a "dangerous rioter" (or whatever metric they'd use) still lies in the hands of the government. If this were a less agreeable and trustworthy part of the world, you'd have to wonder about allowing them that sort of power to shut down dissent.

It all depends on the strength of the guidelines around using something like that, I guess.

Reply

red_pill August 12 2011, 16:05:16 UTC
it might be navie of me, but as long as there is it is either a) done with a judges consent or b) must be reviewed by a judge at, say, 24 hours after cutting it, i would be fine with it. on the other hand, if the home sectery can just kill people shit, then its a whole diffrent ball game.

i tend to have rather alot of trust in judges in genrel.

Reply


anjak_j August 12 2011, 03:10:03 UTC
This asswad needs out of power NOW!

And hands off the Internet too, muppets.

Reply


x_butterfly19_x August 12 2011, 10:11:19 UTC
Go away, Dave.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up