This piece outlines some of the differences between policing in London, and policing in New York. Obviously there are wider factors than just police tactics which affect the outcomes, but it is a good starting point for discussion. I have tried to include all links from the original article in case people want to read further.
Unarmed Officers
(
Read more... )
Comments 80
"Since 1990, a New York Police Department report on “shooting restraint” shows, officers have shot and killed 195 people."
This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: August 10, 2011
An earlier version of this post accidentally understated the number of people shot and killed by police officers in New York since the start of 1990. Thanks to a reader for pointing out the error, which has been corrected above.
"Since 1990, a New York Police Department report on “shooting restraint” shows, officers have shot and killed 375 people."
Reply
Reply
...three hundred and seventy five people.
...fuck.
Reply
INB4 GUNS MAKE US ALL SAVER!!!11 \O/
Reply
Reply
Reply
Jail.
Reply
Reply
Reply
And this ... says it all. [listen from about 01.30]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9560000/9560646.stm
Reply
Additionally, what on earth are the police's firearms officers doing using dumdum bullets? Are they trying to stop there from being any living witnesses to any excesses?
Reply
It's worth remembering that, whatever happened, the man a) did have a gun and b) the police aren't obligated to wait to be shot at for a shooting to be considered a "clean shoot".
I'm not saying that the shooting was defensible, as I'm sure an investigation is underway to ascertain if that was the case, but the mere fact that the police shot first doesn't make them necessarily guilty of excess.
Reply
given that any use of a firearm by the police is viewed as a shoot to kill thing (and lets not dance around this, anyone who shots a gun at anther person aims to kill, aiming to wound is not a seires option, given all the factors involved, you aim for the body), its then all a matter of effectivenss. hollow point bullits are, as you point out, highly effective, and there is no ban, natinal or internaitnal, aginst there use by civil authoritys. also, i suspect, hollow points are used becous there highly ineffective aginst body amour and expend all there engery in the targe, redusing the chance of fatle riccoche and pass through, so people arnt hit by bullits coming out of the body.
the man was carrying a loaded fire arm. i dont know what happend, but provided all other prosdure was carryed out, and he didnt complie with a command to disarm, the threat to life of possion of such a wepone, if brandished, would warrent the shooting.
Reply
As I understand it, one of the reasons for thinking that the bullet in the radio was police issue is because it didn't just go straight through the radio.
Reply
Leave a comment