Ok theres this: "sources familiar with the discussions said Thursday..."
Then there's this: "Associates say..."
Then there's this: " A second source also said..."
Then there's this: "Revelations of these discussions could hurt Clinton's efforts as America's top diplomat if she is seen as a lame duck in the job at a time of great foreign policy challenges for the Obama administration."
could hurt Clinton... could hurt Clinton... could hurt Clinton...
To me the fact that State and the WH are pushing back so hard seems odd. Some reporter (can't remember which one) posted on twitter and said something like "the truth is probably somewhere in between what Reuters and the State Dept say" and that seems to make the most sense to me.
Comments 12
I am shocked. SHOCKED, I tell you.
Reply
I find it pretty shocking that Reuters would print such a BOLD FACE assertion- without consulting um-- you know Clinton first?
But as the press has alway treated Ms. Clinton so nicely.... Um yeah.
Reply
Then there's this: "Associates say..."
Then there's this: " A second source also said..."
Then there's this: "Revelations of these discussions could hurt Clinton's efforts as America's top diplomat if she is seen as a lame duck in the job at a time of great foreign policy challenges for the Obama administration."
could hurt Clinton...
could hurt Clinton...
could hurt Clinton...
What do we think?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment