Delaware’s Homosexual Civil Union Bill Is Anti-Civil Rights

[shoujokakumei]

Delaware’s Homosexual Civil Union Bill Is Anti-Civil RightsMay 13th, 2011 by Frank Knotts

Comments

[beoweasel]

. . .

What the fuck did I just read?

[beoweasel]

Of course, if the bill had been written in the way they say it should be, it would given conservatives the ammunition to argue that the law 'paves the way for people to enter into civil unions with children or animals.'

[sparkindarkness]

What the hell is this shit?!

ooohy boo, bloody hoo the pooor straighties can't have a civil union? Maybe if the straighties would acknowledge that we're WORTHY of their precious marriage this wouldn't be an issue

The STRAIGHTIES are upset because they afre denied access to the lesser, second class not-really marriage? And they're invoking the idea of seperate but not equal? Where do we even begin on this shit?

I can't believe anyone is this clueless - this is calculated bigotry. I don't know whether to be enraged or laugh at the poor whining straighty who is so damn upset because he can't have access to NOT!Marriage, a status created EXPRESSLY to exclude gay people from the hallowed halls of marriage.

[chaya]

Tags?

Also,

If the law does not include all people then it is unconstitutional.

Don't think about that too hard, dear sir.

[mollywobbles867]

lol right? I just...I can't.

[shoujokakumei]

Sorry, forgot to tag when posted, and then I left for work before it got approved. I added a tag and I'll see if more work when I get home... LJ sucks on my phone. :x

[hinoema]

Well, then the institution of marriage is 'unconstitutional'.

[stellar_kar]

If all people were treated equally under the law, civil unions would be unnecessary because an entire class of people wouldn't be excluded from the legal institution of marriage

no no see there you go making sense again, they don't want to hear that.