Julian Assange: "The Jewish Conspiracy Is Out To Get Me!11!"

Mar 01, 2011 18:24

LONDON - A report published by a British magazine on Tuesday said the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, suggested that British journalists, including the editor of the newspaper The Guardian, were engaged in a Jewish-led conspiracy to smear his organization ( Read more... )

wtf, conspiracy theories/theorists, julian assange, wikileaks, jewish people, anti-semitism

Leave a comment

Comments 138

ghost_busting March 1 2011, 23:35:32 UTC
Riiiiiiight.

Reply

bluetooth16 March 1 2011, 23:36:44 UTC
If it really existed, WikiLeaks would have been shut down AGES AGO.

Reply


actourdreams March 1 2011, 23:39:03 UTC
OH FER FUCK'S SAKE.


... )

Reply

OT popehippo March 1 2011, 23:39:35 UTC
Where are these Dukat gifs coming from, because they're desperately making me want to go on a DS9 binge.

Reply

Re: OT actourdreams March 1 2011, 23:44:01 UTC
Tumblr's DS9 tag has been very bountiful. :D

Reply

popehippo March 1 2011, 23:45:55 UTC
Oh, tumblr, you are my internet lifemate.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

bluetooth16 March 1 2011, 23:41:50 UTC
I hate the Times too (for completely different reasons of couse). However this article is basically summing up what was said by Assange directly in a different publication:

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

bluetooth16 March 1 2011, 23:48:10 UTC
Knowing media law, I can't quite take UK Libel Law seriously. Their laws are biased towards the government/butthurt people who sue because they're annoyed some paper told the truth about their shit.

ETA: Several other articles from other organizations on this topic collaborate not only what Assange said but what was said. I don't think the Times or Private Eye are pulling a tag team fast one.

Reply


evewithanapple March 1 2011, 23:40:31 UTC
Waiting for bludstone to try and defend him in five . . . four . . .

Reply

bluetooth16 March 1 2011, 23:42:28 UTC
Oh lawd he will NOT get away with that. Not on my Neocon watch.

Reply

subversive_kiwi March 2 2011, 00:05:47 UTC
Gürl, it's not the special purview of the Neocon watch! I think the comm would dogpile so hard that afterward, you wouldn't be able to tell who was who. Bipartisanship at its finest!

Reply

bluetooth16 March 2 2011, 00:11:11 UTC
Neocons hate WikiLeaks so actually it DOES. Also, yeah if he tried anything with
-isms then he would be dogpiled so quick.

Reply


lyssna March 1 2011, 23:42:02 UTC
Maybe I'm just brainwashed from living in The Saudi-Arabia of Feminism™, but I hate him more and more for every thing he says.

Reply

mswyrr March 1 2011, 23:59:08 UTC
I don't generally think it's okay to mention someone's looks--especially not to imply that their disgusting character can be determined from their looks-- but it's interesting to me that I found him oddly attractive way, way back before his putrid shit came out. But now... the more I hear from him, the more my mental image of him is of a disgusting white rat.


... )

Reply

subversive_kiwi March 2 2011, 00:07:58 UTC
I'm WOUNDED.


... )

Reply

mswyrr March 2 2011, 00:12:03 UTC
Awwwww. :-/

((pets ickle adorable white rat))

Obviously there are some white rats that are better people than Assange.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up