High Speed Rail Authority approves what critics call 'train to nowhere'

Dec 12, 2010 23:48


Citing a need for jobs and fast approaching federal deadlines for funding, the California High Speed Rail Authority board Thursday unanimously approved construction of the first leg of the state's proposed bullet train - a 65-mile section in the Central Valley that would not carry passengers until more of the system is built.

Costing at least ( Read more... )

stimulus, california, amtrak!

Leave a comment

Comments 22

Mod note. rex_dart December 13 2010, 10:00:46 UTC
This needs a cut, please.

Reply

Re: Mod note. merig00 December 13 2010, 14:16:47 UTC
done

Reply


normaltrouble December 13 2010, 12:26:54 UTC
We could sincerely use some stimulus money and more progress & cooperation on the Californian rails between San Diego through to Sonoma County, and in my dreams, all the way up through Portland, to Seattle...

This would be truly useful. I'd love to be able to go from Santa Rosa to Los Angeles, in what, 3-4 hours via the train? I think business people would also like to be able to be in SF from Santa Rosa in around an hour and half including a bus shuttle and ferry shuttle from the Bay.
More convenient and faster than a car.

Certainly better than the current bus systems--which always gets chipped away every 18 months or so around 1-2 % in scheduling times and seems to go up in price at the same time.

California could use a high speed rail,and connections north would be great, also. But I would think the San Diego-La-San Jose-San Francisco connections to be more important.

Reply

grace_om December 13 2010, 15:23:17 UTC
Also connecting the Bay Area to Sacramento would be awesome! It is such a shitty drive...

Reply

normaltrouble December 13 2010, 23:07:23 UTC
Plus tt's a common business/political/social connection--a train connection to Oakland, SF and Santa Rosa maybe a couple places in Mendocino, would make sense.

Reply


doverz December 13 2010, 15:35:22 UTC
I'm just sad that the state of Wisconsin's stupid governor decide to ruin our chance of having a high speed rail. It obviously won't be a big thing in Wisconsin right now, but in the future, it would and it sucks that Scott Walker and dumb Wisconsin residents couldn't see that.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

whatisurdamage December 14 2010, 01:38:33 UTC
Oh man that would be amaaaaaaazing

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: Strange definition of "nowhere" thecityofdis December 13 2010, 16:47:04 UTC
I think maybe "nowhere" is referring to the fact that the line won't carry passengers until more of it is built? Which I guess to critics, in the meantime, could make it look like this is just for decoration.

Reply

Re: Strange definition of "nowhere" saramiskismet December 13 2010, 17:47:11 UTC
This is just a step one project, geez. They'll fund more of it when they reach a point where they can build more of it. Silly critics.

Reply

Re: Strange definition of "nowhere" fenris_lorsrai December 13 2010, 18:24:21 UTC
That and if they did it the other way around, starting with the densest areas, people would bitch that nothing was happening as they tried to get the right of ways. They wouldn't break ground for years ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up