Mr. Feingold, in a statement, said he voted against Ms. Mikulski’s proposal because of the projected cost of $940 million over 10 years.
“I am disappointed that the Senate health care debate has gotten off on the wrong foot,” he said. “The first amendment voted on would add almost a billion dollars to our budget deficits over the next 10 years. We should make sure health plans cover women’s preventive care and screenings, but we should also find a way to pay for it, rather than adding that cost to the already mountainous public debt.”
Feingold is a good guy, he supports the public option & single payer (not to mention his other very progressive stances) but he's also very fiscally strict. I don't blame him for voting against it tbh.
Comments 33
Reply
Reply
Now that Al Franken is on it I think maybe he can make it pass and make some Republicans look like jackasses at the same time.
Reply
the number is zero.
Reply
I think Franken can be the next Teddy Kennedy but funnier.
Reply
Yeah, funnier and less tragic.
Reply
Reply
“I am disappointed that the Senate health care debate has gotten off on the wrong foot,” he said. “The first amendment voted on would add almost a billion dollars to our budget deficits over the next 10 years. We should make sure health plans cover women’s preventive care and screenings, but we should also find a way to pay for it, rather than adding that cost to the already mountainous public debt.”
Feingold is a good guy, he supports the public option & single payer (not to mention his other very progressive stances) but he's also very fiscally strict. I don't blame him for voting against it tbh.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment