Maria Foscarinis, executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty in Washington, D.C., called the measure "outrageous" and said it would be cheaper to provide homeless people with housing.
no shit. but they don't care about being semi-decent humans or even frugal, just about ~setting an example. rme.
They can gather all their energy in resources in doing shit like this, but they can't(don't want to lbr) put their heads together to get to the root of the problem to solve it.
There are cities that are starting to house the homeless population and they are actually saving a shit ton of money. Giving those who are down some hope and dignity goes a long way.
Comments 15
no shit. but they don't care about being semi-decent humans or even frugal, just about ~setting an example. rme.
Reply
Reply
You mean for people who are allergic to seeing people without housing and what they have to resort to.
But right now you have the ability to adopt an ordinance that promotes healthy and safe streets
For who? Certainly not people who live on the streets. If someone is exposed to the elements, how is that safe and healthy?
Instead of addressing the issues that have led to people living on the streets, they just want to punish people for making do.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Even if it saves money, people would rather punish the poor.
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment