Leave a comment

Comments 10

mastadge March 12 2015, 17:30:45 UTC
This is not "controversial," it's idiotic, and he deserves copious public humiliation.

Reply


moonshaz March 12 2015, 17:43:12 UTC
Agreed!

Reply


ladycyndra March 12 2015, 17:56:43 UTC
Yeah, no. Fuck you. Maybe a wolf should drag this idiot away.

Reply

mickeym March 12 2015, 19:54:15 UTC
That would probably end up giving the wolf indigestion or worse, though. Poor wolf. /snark

:)

Reply

jocelyncs March 13 2015, 12:24:03 UTC
That's animal cruelty! What'd a wolf ever do to deserve that?!

Reply


rhysande March 12 2015, 20:36:44 UTC
I interpreted his remarks as being more along the lines of "Wolves are such dangerous predators that they will kill the entire homeless population if we don't annihilate them first." Still stupid, but not a suggestion to use wolves as a final solution to the problem of homelessness.

Nomadic societies have lived and flourished alongside wolves for centuries.

Reply

spyral_out March 12 2015, 23:33:14 UTC
I read it the same way. Still an ignorant and appalling statement regarding both wildlife and human empathy, and he needs to shut his flapping mouth.

Reply

world_dancer March 13 2015, 21:51:35 UTC
This.

I tend to be pro animal rights and I support protecting grey wolves and other endangered species.

But I actually respect his statement as painting a vivid picture of the difficulty of living in an area with dangerous, predatory animals around. It doesn't change my stance on the wolves, but I would be open to attempts to compromise and understand that the wolves pose a danger to his constituents, one that they have to live with and I don't.

As to his comments on the homeless, I don't actually think this is indicative of anything about his stance toward them. I take it as scolding of other lawmakers for whom he thinks the homeless should be a more important issue, and his statement does emphasize their vulnerability to natural outdoor hazards.

I realize that in an age of the Internet, everyone likes to pick at everything. And maybe he's a horrible guy in other respects. But based on this article, he's just a guy who dramatically illustrated his point(s) about the dangers of wolves and the vulnerability of the homeless.

Reply

rhysande March 14 2015, 02:05:11 UTC
You can chuck Young in the 'Horrible Person' bin with no worry that he may have been wrongly categorized. This statement was insensitive, inaccurate, and melodramatic, yet better than a lot of what comes out of his mouth. His big concern is the small percentage of profit that may be lost due to wolf predation of livestock. He's just wrapped it in false concern about the lives of the homeless.

Reply


darth_eldritch March 12 2015, 20:40:24 UTC
Unless they are genuinely going to help, people should shut the fuck up about the poor and homeless.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up