Leave a comment

Comments 54

nextdrinksonme March 22 2014, 21:32:15 UTC
"I was struck in the first episode where [Tyson] talked about science and how, you know, all ideas are discussed, you know, everything is up for discussion -- it's all on the table -- and I thought to myself, 'No, consideration of special creation is definitely not open for discussion, it would seem.'"

BECAUSE IT ISN'T A SCIENTIFIC IDEA YOU FUCKING IDIOT

Reply

sunhawk March 23 2014, 15:23:19 UTC
^ THIIIIIIIIIIS

Reply


scolaro March 22 2014, 21:33:37 UTC
'No, consideration of special creation is definitely not open for discussion, it would seem.'

I believe NDT also doesn't talk about unicorns much.
TEACH THE CONTROVERSY!

Reply

robintheshrew March 23 2014, 02:15:28 UTC
...I want everything on that site o.o

Reply

scolaro March 23 2014, 08:29:42 UTC
IKR? If I was rich, they'd be my exclusive T-Shirt outfitters. XD

Reply

robintheshrew March 23 2014, 19:50:59 UTC
Damn you, student loans! *shakes fist*

Reply


liliaeth March 22 2014, 22:36:26 UTC
I wonder how they'd feel if the show responded by spending some time on non-monotheistic creation stories....

Reply

jocelyncs March 22 2014, 22:44:30 UTC
Aw, yiiiisss! *rubs hands together*. I LIKE this idea!

Reply

liliaeth March 22 2014, 22:52:09 UTC
I mean, I'm a Christian, but I have no issue whatsoever reconciling my faith with the current scientific theories. And why should I, there's nothing in those theories that contradicts the possibility of God as the creator.

But then these people just can't seem to understand mythology's use of metaphor as a way to understand something. Basically all creation stories come down to that, whether it's the monotheistic ones, or the Hindu one, or the Norse one or whichever religion you pick, all of them are basically people trying to find a connection with the creator through metaphor.

And yet it seems to be that it's only these creationists who have a problem understanding the difference between science and metaphor.

Reply

lied_ohne_worte March 23 2014, 06:08:32 UTC
I think the problem is that they have no theology with proper methodology, which would include using evil, evil science to try to get at at the meaning of Biblical texts. I mean, the branch of Christianity I belong to requires pastors to study for years at a normal university, and the methods applied to the texts are the same people in the other humanities use, such as determining the origins of Biblical texts and the ideas they contain.

And once you have moved beyond "The bible is written by God, and all of it is literally true!", you have a lot more leeway in interpreting the texts, which also includes not necessarily having to follow all the rules made by people living in a desert several thousand years ago, or by someone who clearly had a problem with women (why hello there, Paul, what did we ever do to you ( ... )

Reply


idemandjustice March 23 2014, 00:14:14 UTC
I can't even laugh at this anymore. It's making me angry. I'm sick of it.

Reply


Creationists ... bmh4d0k3n March 23 2014, 00:45:25 UTC

... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up