Walmart Threatens To Shut Down Stores If DC Passes Living Wage Bill

Jul 10, 2013 16:08

Walmart fought hard to persuade DC residents to let it open stores in the district. But now the retail giant is threatening to walk away from three planned sites if the DC City Council passes a “living wage” bill that would require all major employers to pay workers a minimum of $12.50 an hour ( Read more... )

wtf, wal-mart, labor, washington d.c., corporations

Leave a comment

Comments 74

kitanabychoice July 10 2013, 20:53:16 UTC
Ugh, so disgusting. I wish there was some other way to stick it to WalMart other than boycotting.

Reply

nextdrinksonme July 10 2013, 20:55:26 UTC
What really bugs me is that these legislators have the chance to really stick it to Wal-Mart and tell them "well see ya" and pass the bill. We'll see, tomorrow, but I think that's the only way there's any choice of combating them--it has to be done at that level, since doing it at ours obviously doesn't work (especially since so many people don't have much of a choice but to shop there due to availability, prices, transportation, etc).

Reply

gambitia July 10 2013, 23:35:28 UTC
especially since so many people don't have much of a choice but to shop there due to availability, prices, transportation, etc

Exactly this. We need legislative action because in many ways Wal-Mart functions as a monopoly and the "will of the consumer" or whatever capitalists call it can't be exercised in a monopoly.

Reply


fabrisse July 10 2013, 20:55:59 UTC
Walmart did its best to circumvent the "First Source" laws we have in DC which would have required a living wage in the first place. I hope the Council stands tall and we can find another retailer to anchor those spaces. I know that our one Target is very popular...

Reply


otana July 10 2013, 20:57:54 UTC
Fucking disgusting. I know they're banking on states looking at how much money they'll lose if Walmart doesn't embed itself like a fucking tick, but they should be thinking about the health and quality of life of their constituents. And if that doesn't convince them then the amount they'll have to spend on social services (in Cali for example MediCal and Healthy Way LA) should make them hesitate.

Reply

moonshaz July 10 2013, 22:03:05 UTC
Walmart embedding itself like a fucking tick is a powerful and eerily apt analogy! O_O

Reply

otana July 10 2013, 22:44:51 UTC
I kinda like it. You've gotta be real careful removing it once it's there, but leaving it be is even more harmful.

Reply

lied_ohne_worte July 10 2013, 23:27:41 UTC
Sounds good. And reading this and similar posts, I'm really relieved that they cut their losses and retreated from my country when it became clear that this country and their way of doing things weren't compatible.

Reply


redstar826 July 10 2013, 21:02:49 UTC
I'm seeing on twitter that the living wage bill just passed

Reply

moonshaz July 10 2013, 22:03:36 UTC
Really? AWESOME!

Reply

nextdrinksonme July 10 2013, 22:05:42 UTC
Oh sweet.

I completely forgot it was Wednesday. Thought it was Tuesday when I posted.

Reply

ohmiya_sg July 11 2013, 00:04:14 UTC
Nice! Can't wait to hear their response...

Reply


nitasee July 10 2013, 21:09:22 UTC
Walmart’s refusal to pay their employees a livable wage translates into a bigger burden for taxpayers. A Congressional report found that the workforce of a single Walmart store consume roughly a million dollars in public benefits every year, relying on “safety net” programs like Medicaid, food stamps, school lunch, and housing assistance to survive. Since Walmart is the largest private retailer in the nation, the full taxpayer cost of the store’s labor practices is exponentially higher.

Based on this, I've heard that Walmart should be considered the largest recipient of US corporate subsidy. Our tax dollars support this company in making an ungodly profit.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up