Leave a comment

Comments 24

alexvdl May 17 2013, 18:05:33 UTC
Didn't Freakanomics show that legalizing abortion actually reduced crime?

Reply

crossfire May 17 2013, 20:17:17 UTC
Excuse you, those are facts you're talking about.

Reply

meran_flash May 19 2013, 03:25:50 UTC
fuck Freakanomics tbh

Reply

alexvdl May 19 2013, 03:29:37 UTC
???

Reply


zinnia_rose May 17 2013, 18:10:32 UTC
Yes, because nobody's ever been killed in the name of religion.

Reply

zinnia_rose May 17 2013, 18:10:56 UTC
OH WAIT...

Reply


mickeym May 17 2013, 18:26:36 UTC
Honestly, this guy (and the others like him) makes me think of the Westboro Baptist asses, equating gay rights with dead soldiers. :-/

Reply

moonshaz May 18 2013, 20:57:42 UTC
VERY strong resemblance there, yes.

Reply


little_rachael May 18 2013, 01:35:32 UTC
I was going to say that it's not as though you have to believe in God to know murdering innocent people is wrong, but then I realize he's not suggesting that it's atheists who are committing these crimes. He's suggesting that God's such an asshole that he'd will innocent people to die as a punishment for people not having the right religion.

Why would anyone want to believe in a God like that?

Reply

screamingintune May 18 2013, 04:44:58 UTC
I've always that the God conservatives describe sounds like a total asshole

Reply

hinoema May 18 2013, 10:37:09 UTC
He's the manifestation of the assholes they wish they could be.

Reply


littlelauren86 May 18 2013, 08:07:11 UTC
Um, the two things don't have anything to do with each other. How do they even come up with this crap?

Reply

hinoema May 18 2013, 10:35:52 UTC
Because the rational process of people like this includes an arbitrary factor. While most people process on a line from cause to effect where cause and effect must be related, statements like the one Cramer made indicate a line of reasoning that proceeds from cause to 'god' to effect. Think of 'cause' as "anything that is either generally good or generally bad, that you are supposed to do (or not do) according to their internalized rules, regardless of what it is", and effect as "bad things that happen, regardless of what they are" and insert this 'god' as the associative factor, and there you have it- theo-logic.

People did things they weren't supposed to do, 'god' saw these things, the effect was bad things happening. No further rational connection is needed, because, you know, 'god'. This seems to be a perfectly acceptable form of 'logic' to some people.

That's what happens to rational process when you throw an ineffable factor in the mix.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up