UKIP couple have foster children removed from care.

Nov 24, 2012 10:03

A couple have had three foster children removed from their care because they belong to the UK Independence Party.

Rotherham Borough Council said the children were "not indigenous white British" and that it had concerns about UKIP's stance on immigration.

Read more )

adoption, uk: labour party, immigration, uk

Leave a comment

Comments 59

hinoema November 24 2012, 16:32:20 UTC
Agreeing with all the side-eyes up-thread. I just wanted to mention that there is no such thing as "indigenous British" unless they're Homo Heidelbergensis.

Reply

mangosorbet007 November 24 2012, 16:47:15 UTC
From Heidelberg, Nottinghamshire. :-)

Reply

maenads_dance November 24 2012, 22:09:07 UTC
Is that Piltdown Man?

Reply

bowtomecha November 25 2012, 03:16:43 UTC
If they called themselves Picts or Britons then it might work. The Sami have been around in Nordic lands not much longer and they are classified as indigenous. But lets face it, these party members are doing it to to be assholes.

Reply


aella_irene November 24 2012, 16:34:28 UTC
In with everyone else to say that, um, yes, UKIP members adopting children who come under their hatred of 'immigrants'? Is bad.

(Also, I think the article suggests that the children were from a Polish background.)

Reply

I thought they were Roma? jazzypom November 25 2012, 15:53:10 UTC
I do know that there's been a surge of Romany children being over here since Hungary and Latvia joined the EU. But I could be wrong.

Reply


mangosorbet007 November 24 2012, 16:48:47 UTC
Adoption =/= fostering. Just a minor clarification. Fostering might lead to adoption but usually that is not at all the planned outcome.

Reply

elialshadowpine November 25 2012, 08:12:27 UTC
Thiiis.

I stopped and re-read the article because the way it's written, if you're skimming and not paying close attention, it sounds like the article is about adopted kids being taken away. The tone of the piece is sensationalist and mentions adoption in enough places for it to sound like that's what's going on if you don't catch the distinction between fostering and adoption, and it preys on the fact that a lot of people really honestly don't know much about either.

Reply


jettakd November 24 2012, 17:11:12 UTC
if even the most well-intentioned white people can accidentally mess up raising adopted children of color that they love and adore, what makes you think a couple who's political beliefs are founded upon what basically amounts to isolation and segregation can properly raised kids of color?

Reply

thelilyqueen November 24 2012, 23:29:46 UTC
Exactly. I may adopt someday(USian), and the idea of even a white infant/toddler from a part of the country I've never lived in is a little intimidating in terms of seeing they're properly aware of where they came from. Toss in ethnic and racial issues, and it gets way more complicated. More so *again* if they're adopted internationally at a very young age.

Reply


pleasure_past November 24 2012, 17:31:16 UTC
Joining everyone else in saying that it was a good idea to take these kids away, and if not allowing people who hate immigrants to raise immigrants is a "slippery slope," it's one I'm willing to go a lot farther down.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up