Leave a comment

Comments 27

matrixmann December 10 2019, 20:12:00 UTC
Hm... Interesting idea to change the concept.

I'd regard this from a rather practical point of view: To people which can purchase clothes off the peg - those buy enough clothes which are damned to be worn just once and then end up in a dark corner of the closet, if they don't get thrown away right away.
So - in terms of the recent climate craze, it would be a little piece of helping this issue if you found a concept to supply people with this wear-once outfits they disregard right after that anyway, but the clothes don't end up in the closet after that and get thrown away in years anyway, but lots of resources had been invested in producing them. Then go try recycling them by letting the people rent them for just one or two days and then let somebody else do the same after that time has expired...

Well, this is just a test route, so don't expect that much of it anyway.

Btw, where is this plush cactus from? Never seen anything like that.

Reply

onb2017 December 11 2019, 03:46:24 UTC
XD The cactus is a local troll ...not exactly the troll...the guy who believes in value of goods. Especially wasteful and stupid like collecting bottle caps or buying tons of clothes. He thinks in the USSR he was deprived of it.
About rent: might be an ok concept but when the profit gets involved it kills it. To start with kind of high price, for example.

Reply

matrixmann December 11 2019, 09:38:11 UTC
Yeah, it would have to be observed what this concept manages to achieve and how it is structurally organized.
Sometimes the idea is good, but the realization gets totally wrong because the wrong focus (e. g. profit) gets applied to it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up