Leave a comment

Comments 80

tetrazzinichikn April 11 2015, 02:29:59 UTC
I am down with this casting.

Reply

bert_macklin April 11 2015, 02:38:55 UTC
Better than Vanessa Hudgens and Mary-kate Olsen in Beastly casting

Reply

zoaster_toaster April 11 2015, 02:52:18 UTC
NEGL I didn't find that movie terrible.

Reply

missescapist April 11 2015, 03:19:49 UTC
i forgot that movie existed

Reply


velshtein April 11 2015, 02:30:04 UTC
Yesssss.

Reply


josiefier April 11 2015, 02:31:07 UTC
Um... okay? He wouldn't have been my first thought, but I'm not mad about it either.

Reply


kilkenny5 April 11 2015, 02:31:08 UTC
The supporting cast is more interesting than the leading roles.

Reply

zoaster_toaster April 11 2015, 02:31:47 UTC
Such flops for the leads.

Reply

obiwancannolis April 11 2015, 02:34:02 UTC
100% agreed! I wish they would have gone for an unknown for Belle the way they did for Cinderella. The supporting cast is flawless though.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


zoaster_toaster April 11 2015, 02:31:24 UTC
Between this and the rumor of Disney wanting Tom Hiddleston for Lumiere I may be forced to watch this shitshow.

Reply

theoverlymean April 11 2015, 03:05:19 UTC
omg yes pls but can tom sing?

Reply

zoaster_toaster April 11 2015, 03:07:42 UTC
I'm too embarrassed for him to watch the Tinkerbell movie he did but my overall impression is that he...well...he tries lol.

Reply

theoverlymean April 11 2015, 03:27:38 UTC
well, if emma watson can be belle... lol

Reply


Leave a comment

Up