Why The Mummy (1999) Is A Masterpiece

Mar 13, 2019 21:42

image Click to view

* an homage to the adventure/horror movies of the 1930s that doesn't take itself too seriously ( Read more... )

film, rachel weisz, 1990s, review

Leave a comment

Comments 121

bet_on_me March 14 2019, 02:05:27 UTC
YES I loved this movie when it came out and I can still sit through the whole thing with minimal cringing. The worst is the low-quality CGI blending. It was probably good for 1999 but on today's TV screens it's so painfully obvious. We watched Phantom Menace a couple of weeks ago and same thing. On lower-res tvs the animation isn't bad but now it's like you're watching Mary Poppins.

Reply

insomniachobs March 14 2019, 12:30:35 UTC
For the time it was supposed to be amazing (I don't know anything about CGI, but a friend's dad in the film industry recommended it to us precisely because it was supposedly such a feat)

Reply


bloopbloop01 March 14 2019, 02:05:32 UTC
Those scarabs were iconic

Reply


queen_insane March 14 2019, 02:05:41 UTC
Hell yeah it was. I'm a big fan of the second one too.

Reply

archersangel March 14 2019, 03:16:17 UTC
Same.

The third needs to be wiped from memory & possibly existence.

Reply

queen_insane March 14 2019, 03:23:35 UTC
I didn't even bring up the third because I didn't want anyone to have to deal with that memory, to be honest.

Reply

cuteej4 March 14 2019, 05:24:42 UTC
I adamantly state that Scorpion King is not part of it because it's so shitty. My friend and I went to see it just to prove that it wasn't.

Reply


lord_cellytron March 14 2019, 02:06:04 UTC
This movie is so awesome.

Reply


cruel11 March 14 2019, 02:06:10 UTC
Jonathan was and still is my spirit animal

Reply


Leave a comment

Up