"I don't see any method at all, sir."

Dec 04, 2008 10:28

I'm used to the low buzz of annoyance that I get from reading about bad theory in the social sciences -- especially in "hot" fields like hedonics, decision-making, and moral judgment -- but reading this gee-whiz article (via tdj) on some recent work in moral psychology evoked the kind of visceral resentment that comes from being acutely disappointed ( Read more... )

watch your language, mentat practice, methodology, evolution, cognition

Leave a comment

Comments 8

colinmarshall December 4 2008, 21:18:05 UTC
Narrow specialism is an impediment to the growth of science, but one thing you can say about specialists is that they actually know things

That's some Line of the Day material right there.

Reply

nyuanshin December 4 2008, 22:02:28 UTC
Damn, now I wish I'd put more effort into making that maximally pithy.

Reply

colinmarshall December 4 2008, 22:20:20 UTC
Too late now. There's no way to edit Livejournal entries.

Reply

nyuanshin December 4 2008, 22:43:14 UTC
Edit? Me? Pshaw!

Reply


selfishgene December 4 2008, 23:04:03 UTC
Nice attack on Hauser. I was mulling over an attack similar to your 'patient is the fat man' one. This was based on a presentation not reading his book. I bought the book but I haven't read it yet.
I disagree with your remark 'Best is the middle way'. There is no universal best way for anything. We can develop good strategies but any strategy could turn out to be the wrong answer due to facts not known.
'You have to use that big, expensive glucose sink sitting in that thickly armored hemisphere between your ears.'

Reply

nyuanshin December 4 2008, 23:57:19 UTC
Heh heh heh.

That would be why I didn't use the modifier "universal".

Reply


Leave a comment

Up