Usually, I find that I'm a bit suspicious of pieces of writing that speak a little too easily or universally about cultural symbols of a generation. I tend to favour complexity over simplicity in any kind of analysis, just as a matter of course, and of trying to be realistic about anything in a given moment in history. If I'm being quick in that
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
(The comment has been removed)
...I'm going to crawl back into my corner now.
Reply
This doesn't have to do with this article, but I thought you might enjoy this:
Usher on MJ: "It's pretty hard right now, man. Michael Jackson transcended culture. He transcended love, man. He changed the barrier of life and the way we looked at things."
As for me, despite people's genuine attachment to their own memories and cultural experiences, and what I think is honest dismay at his death, I find celebrity deaths particularly hard to stomach. Michael obviously was a very damaged person, but I'd like to think that he (like everyone else) can meet his own death... on his own, I guess. But the circus never ends.
Reply
Thanks for the critique. I appreciate your taking the time.
Sincerely,
Ted Anthony
Reply
If you’re not familiar with the term yet, google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s recently gotten a ton of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. The Associated Press' annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.
Here's a page with a good overview of recent stuff about GenJones:
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html
Reply
Leave a comment