Originally published at
Jason's Fresh Produce. You can comment here or
there.
Conspiracy Theory with Mel Gibson was, in my opinion, a very enjoyable movie, but disappointingly low tech.
Lots of movies and cop dramas nowadays have the archetypal tac board with obsessively clipped newspaper articles and colored bits of string connecting seemingly
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Also, you're asking computers to do something they're still not very good at -- pattern recognition. In contrast, human brains are so good at it that we routinely see recognizable shapes in clouds and shadows. That ability, to see patterns which AREN'T EVEN THERE, is what conspiracy theory rests on.
Reply
Let's take the archetypal conspiracy theory: that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't act alone. What is a computer going to do with Lee Harvey Oswald's time in the Soviet Union? How would a computer take the theory that Kennedy's body was tampered with to make it look as if he had only been shot from the rear and connect it to...well...anything?
Essentially, your options would be 1) shitty pattern-matching search ("JOHN Connally takes a bullet; Kennedy succeeded by Lyndon JOHNston? Conspiracy!") or 2) something involving the ability to process written material and actually understand what it means, which would be the holy grail of artificial intelligence research and which we are by no means even remotely close to.
Reply
Reply
Looked at that way, computer searches for conspiracy evidence might actually be fruitful. After all, the point of conspiracy theory isn't to analyze the data and discover unexpected patterns. In actual practice, conspiracy theorists start with the conspiracy as an axiom and then search through the data to find any half-assed connections which gullible people like themselves will accept as "proof".
Reply
Leave a comment