We have a president in this country who wishes us to believe he cares, that he is a Uniter-nary a Divider. I beg to differ, sir. I will always expect there to be a fringe on either side of any political spectrum intent on bringing radical measures to vote (or, even, committee) that haven’t the slightest ability to make it into law. But when the
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
Reply
If you look back into bushy's 2000 campaign, he said he was for leaving it up to the states. That bastard.
Reply
Bush also said no nation building. Woops. It just goes to show that politicians will do whatever they think will get them elected. Gross. Disgusting. Etc, etc.
Reply
Reply
Reply
You might not remember me. Melanie from Tech Team. Haha. Nerdy.
Anyway, I was looking up Bend journals and came across yours, and I like what you have to say, and as for this post, I wholeheartedly agree. My opinion is that marriage in this country is an entirely secular event (despite its origins), and therefore religious grounds for leaving a group of people out of it are not applicable. That pretty much leaves the "slippery slope" argument, which is very weak.
But yeah. Hope you don't mind if I add you.
Reply
I’ll be adding you right on back.
Reply
Reply
Three cheers,
-David
Reply
Leave a comment